download VS Bulma

I first started building the app in the browser, using PDF.js and Download.js to take a PDF and edit it, and then download it to your computer.

In short, is there a way to do this with any decently mature wasm targeting frontend framework?

Today I want to share something I've been working on that combines two things I love: clean CSS frameworks and Material Design aesthetics. I just launched Plus Ultra, an open-source CSS library that brings Material Design components to Bulma CSS while keeping all the flexbox goodness that makes Bulma so powerful.

Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but it's 2023 and there are so many other libraries one could use outside of Bootstrap; TailwindCSS, Bulma, Materialize CSS, just to name a few. Forget that for a minute, maybe we can use a Blazor component library to speed up development; there are a few in the market: MudBlazor, Telerik, Syncfusion, Radzen. Ultimately, we go with what we already have a license for, Telerik.

Thanks! Much credit goes to the Bulma[1] css framework, I guess. I am mostly a backend dev. I've just used bulma for the most part and tried to avoid anything fancy.

[1]: https://bulma.io/

Bulma had a major update this past March to v1.0.0, with a couple minor releases since. Still receiving commits somewhat regularly, so I wouldn't call it dead.

https://github.com/jgthms/bulma/releases

Bulma: Bulma is a modern, open-source CSS framework based on Flexbox. It’s easy to use, responsive, and highly customizable.

For now, we can delegate layout concerns to frameworks like Bootstrap or Bulma, and focus more on management aspects.

9. Bulma A modern CSS framework that is fully responsive and allows for rapid design without the complexity of JavaScript. Bulma:

Bulma CSS framework