dog VS skim

Dog is cross platform and has some nice features, like json output.

https://dns.lookup.dog/

> As a user of the "--color" flag for the `ip` command, I'd love to see tools like dig produce more modern output

https://github.com/ogham/dog is pretty good in that regard

Alternatively, use dog (https://github.com/ogham/dog)

> dog www.readlang.com

A www.readlang.com. 1h59m16s 139.144.234.197

There's this, which is a more modern dig, with color output, among other things: https://github.com/ogham/dog

There's also stuff like this, which will postprocess & color output from any command: https://github.com/garabik/grc, or https://github.com/armandino/TxtStyle

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "dog"

There's also doggo, which you can say is a bit of a dig at dog.

See also "dog" which I've been using for a while, works well. https://github.com/ogham/dog

I really like using something like fuzzy search for menus like these. https://github.com/Cloudef/bemenu is pretty cool in that it works both in a terminal, X11 and on Wayland, so if you want to do something graphical later you can easily migrate. There's also fzf and skim, which work similarly but are only for the terminal.

Current profiles (to be improved upon): | Profile | Details | | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------ | | default | fzf-lua defaults, uses neovim "builtin" previewer and devicons (if available) for git/files/buffers | | fzf-native | utilizes fzf's native previewing ability in the terminal where possible using bat for previews | | fzf-tmux | similar to fzf-native and opens in a tmux popup (requires tmux > 3.2) | | max-perf | similar to fzf-native and disables icons globally for max performance | | telescope | closest match to telescope defaults in look and feel and keybinds | | skim | uses skim as an fzf alternative, (requires the sk binary) |

There’s also a variety of fuzzy finders like https://github.com/lotabout/skim or fzf. Basically the same thing, but different interface.

Have you ever tried sk? skim is an fzf re-write in 🦞. While I use it occasionally, I never really incorporated fzf into my workflow so I'd be interested to hear your opinion.

I’m not familiar at all with fzf, but I do know that skim supports this.

You state that as a blank and white fact, but there's nuance.

https://github.com/lotabout/skim/issues/317#issuecomment-652...

fzf skim

Agreed, but use skim instead