docsify VS Hugo

Compare docsify vs Hugo and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • Appwrite - The open-source backend cloud platform
  • InfluxDB - Collect and Analyze Billions of Data Points in Real Time
  • Onboard AI - Learn any GitHub repo in 59 seconds
docsify Hugo
28 536
25,588 70,186
1.2% 0.9%
8.6 0.0
5 days ago about 19 hours ago
JavaScript Go
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of docsify. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-10.


Posts with mentions or reviews of Hugo. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-21.
  • Building a (Virtual) Events Site
    2 projects | | 21 Nov 2023
    The site has been built with the Hugo static site generator since day one. Back in 2017, when I was originally building the site, I was a big fan of Hugo for its flexibility and speed. Hugo, which is built in Go, is known for extremely fast build times (for example, my 1200+ pages generate in about 7 seconds). This wasn't important when I built it, but it has been beneficial as the site grew large. And, while a lot has changed in the web development framework world since 2017, Hugo still does what I need it to.
  • Monte mi blog personal en
    3 projects | /r/programacion | 18 Nov 2023
  • How To De-index Your Docs From Google (And Then Fix It)
    5 projects | | 15 Nov 2023
    The large differences in approaches and product features led us to rebuild the documentation for Camunda 8. C7 docs are hosted at; the version 8 documentation lives at The two different sites are built with different tooling (Hugo vs Docusaurus).
  • How To Choose the Best Static Site Generator and Deploy it to Kinsta for Free
    15 projects | | 18 Oct 2023
    In terms of GitHub stars, SSGs like Next.js, Hugo, Gatsby, Docusaurus, Nuxt.js, and Jekyll top the list. Some popular SSGs even host conferences and workshops, providing resources and networking opportunities for those looking to explore more advanced topics in depth.
  • Moving the Blog to Elixir
    4 projects | | 16 Oct 2023
    After running my blog with Hugo hosted on Netlify for nearly a decade, I decided to migrate to a custom solution. I think I resisted the urge to rewrite my personal site for long enough and I deserve to have some fun. I am not going to find an excuse. I wanted to do this in Elixir. I wanted to build all the details of a static website from scratch once. It feels empowering to understand everything. And everything I learned along the way is generally useful Elixir knowledge. There are no concepts specific to a single static side generator.
  • Gojekyll – 20x faster Go port of jekyll
    17 projects | | 26 Aug 2023
    I have migrated from Jekyll to Hugo for my own website, but the whole Hugo project is just weird. It took me like a year to migrate my simple website because of all the different paper cuts that drained my will to work on it.

    You are only able to only use partials in HTML pages and shortcodes in Markdown pages. Why? They use 2 different syntax, so the best you can do is awkwardly wrap a partial in a shortcode. What's the point? They serve basically the same purpose.

    Want to set up RSS? Oh yeah, for some reason by default it will not show full content in your feed reader, instead only a small extract with the only way to fix it is by making your own template[1]. But wait, why are we using RSS instead of Atom? Who knows, but if you want to use Atom, you have to use your template and insert some stuff to your config.

    Also don't look at the bug tracker, that thing is frustrates me to no end.

    You of course have the everyone's favourite Stalebot that you might have noticed in my previous link, but if you look at older issues, you will see the maintainer self-botting as a Stalebot[2][3] for some reason.

    You will also see the maintainer moving issues between milestones for years with no end in sight[4].

    Changelogs can sometimes feel a bit, odd too:

    > but also a big shoutout to @dependabot[bot], […] for their ongoing contributions.

    And commit messages sometimes are just… a bit too long[5] (it is truncated by GitHub, you can append .patch to see the full message).

    Their documentation is awful to read too[6]. Oh and the templating engine? Yeah, not documented at all. Also the quick start guide will tell you to git clone some random theme, but I don't want my website to look like someone's, I want to write my own styles and have my own structure, but they don't really tell you anywhere how you should go about it. Because of it, I would search GitHub to sometimes find answers on how to do some stuff, but you would quickly find that most people had no idea how to actually use it. For example you can find a lot of people making opening and ending partials to have a common page layout instead of actually using the built-in Hugo layouts.

    So why have I bothered switching? i18n support, so far out of all SSG I tried, Hugo does it in the least painful way.







    17 projects | | 26 Aug 2023
    That issue should have been closed. This was resolved in Hugo 112.
    17 projects | | 26 Aug 2023
    The fact that Hugo still doesn't play nicely with Tailwind 3 (2 years after T3 was released) is a real pain point.

    I gave up on this ever being fixed quite a while back, but still check on the issue [1] every now and then. Seems like the only activity these days is bep bumping the milestone every month.


    17 projects | | 26 Aug 2023
  • A Developer's Guide to Blogging
    3 projects | | 26 Aug 2023
    For creating a static site I recommend Hugo. In short this is because it is popular, well-supported, fast, and allows you to get up and running quickly with premade templates.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing docsify and Hugo you can also consider the following projects:

astro - The web framework that scales with you — Build fast content sites, powerful web applications, dynamic server APIs, and everything in-between ⭐️ Star to support our work!

MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.

Pelican - Static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Powered by Python.

Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites.

eleventy 🕚⚡️ - A simpler site generator. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML.

Hexo - A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js.

obsidian-export - Rust library and CLI to export an Obsidian vault to regular Markdown

Jekyll - :globe_with_meridians: Jekyll is a blog-aware static site generator in Ruby

SvelteKit - web development, streamlined

gutenberg - A fast static site generator in a single binary with everything built-in.

Nikola - A static website and blog generator