docker-pi-hole VS watchtower

Yesterday I deployed the official pi hole docker container on my raspberry pi 3 and set a custom DNS address on my phone addressing to the pi.

#pihole   pihole:     container_name: pihole     image: pihole/pihole:latest     ports:       - target: 53         published: 53         protocol: tcp         mode: host       - target: 53         published: 53         protocol: udp         mode: host       - "67:67/udp"       - "8070:80/tcp"       - "8073:443/tcp"     environment:       TZ: 'America/Indianapolis'       WEBPASSWORD: #'TEMP_PASSWORD' #'set a secure password here or it will be random'       WEBPASSWORD_FILE: '/etc/pihole/adminpw.txt'     # Volumes store your data between container upgrades     volumes:       - '~/pihole/etc-pihole:/etc/pihole'       - '~/pihole/etc-dnsmasq.d:/etc/dnsmasq.d'     #   https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole#note-on-capabilities     cap_add:       - NET_ADMIN # Recommended but not required (DHCP needs NET_ADMIN)     #network_mode: host     restart: unless-stopped     #UPTIME KUMA   uptime_kuma:     image: louislam/uptime-kuma:1     container_name: uptime-kuma     volumes:      - uptime-kuma:/app/data     ports:      - 8060:3001     restart: always

version: "3" # More info at https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/ and https://docs.pi-hole.net/ networks: dns_net: driver: bridge ipam: config: - subnet: 10.2.0.0/24 services: pihole: depends_on: [unbound] container_name: pihole image: pihole/pihole:latest hostname: pihole networks: dns_net: ipv4_address: 10.2.0.100 ports: - "5335:53/tcp" - "5335:53/udp" - "7000:80/tcp" environment: TZ: ${TZ} WEBPASSWORD: ${PWD} FTLCONF_LOCAL_IPV4: ${HOST_IP} # Set to server's LAN IP, used by web block modes. PIHOLE_DNS_: 10.2.0.200 # Upstream DNS server(s) for Pi-hole to forward queries to, separated by a semicolon DNSMASQ_LISTENING: all # "Listen on all interfaces, permit all origins" # Volumes store your data between container upgrades volumes: - /var/lib/docker/volumes/pihole/etc-pihole:/etc/pihole - /var/lib/docker/volumes/pihole/etc-dnsmasq.d:/etc/dnsmasq.d healthcheck: disable: true restart: unless-stopped unbound: # https://github.com/MatthewVance/unbound-docker container_name: unbound image: mvance/unbound:latest hostname: unbound networks: dns_net: ipv4_address: 10.2.0.200 ports: - "${HOST_IP}:53:53/udp" - "${HOST_IP}:53:53/tcp" healthcheck: disable: true restart: unless-stopped

services: pihole: container_name: pihole image: pihole/pihole:latest hostname: pihole # Container hostname (optional) domainname: mynetwork.local # Container domain (optional) mac_address: f7:55:63:b0:68:83 # Random MAC address (optional) networks: virtualnet: # Name of macvlan ipv4_address: 192.168.100.249 # Desired IP for pihole dns: - 127.0.0.1 - 1.1.1.1 ports: - "53:53/tcp" - "53:53/udp" - "67:67/udp" - "80:80/tcp" - "443:443/tcp" volumes: - ./pihole-configs/:/etc/pihole/ - ./dnsmasq.d-configs/:/etc/dnsmasq.d/ # DNSMASQ_USER # https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/issues/963 # https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/blob/master/README.md#upgrade-notes environment: FTLCONF_LOCAL_IPV4: 10.59.0.6 # Desired IP for pihole VIRTUAL_HOST: pihole.mynetwork.local DNSMASQ_USER: root PIHOLE_DNS_: 1.1.1.1;1.0.0.1;2606:4700:4700::1111;2606:4700:4700::1001 restart: unless-stopped # Set container to always restart

You could have a look at docker and try to run a more recent Ubuntu image on the Nano https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole

My advice would be either use the docker-pi-hole documentation/quick start, or contact the content creator.

Related: https://github.com/containrrr/watchtower

> if you're using the docker image, upgrades are a breeze. Just bump the tag on the image, redeploy, and you're done.

Or you could just run Watchtower beside it and it will automatically update your docker containers. https://github.com/containrrr/watchtower If you are OK with automated updates.

So i primarily use containers on my local machine walled off from the internet, so it's not a big concern for me. Watchtower [1] is popular among home server users too which automatically updates containers to the latest image.

For production uses I think companies generally build their own containers. They would have a common base linux container and build the other containers based off that with a typical CI/CD pipeline. So if glibc is patched, it's probably patched in the base container and the others are then rebuilt. You don't have to patch each container individually, just the base. Production also minimizes the scope of containers with nothing installed except what's necessary so they have few dependencies.

[1] https://github.com/containrrr/watchtower

You can use Watchtower (https://containrrr.dev/watchtower/) that solves problem of manual pulling on VPS.

I checked https://containrrr.dev/watchtower/ and Arguments, but I don't understand where to attach that using portainer.

Again, there are options to automate some of the burden here by using tools such as Watchtower.

Have you ever deployed a Docker app on a server, but everytime you push a new version of your image to a Docker registry you need to manually restart your app? If you want to automate this restarting, this blog post is for you! I am now going to show you how you can do this with literally 1 simple command using Watchtower!