dns-over-https VS dnsproxy

Compare dns-over-https vs dnsproxy and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
dns-over-https dnsproxy
3 56
1,879 2,169
- 2.5%
6.7 8.3
8 days ago 7 days ago
Go Go
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

dns-over-https

Posts with mentions or reviews of dns-over-https. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-01.
  • Bypass Transparent DNS Proxy
    1 project | dev.to | 20 Jul 2022
    I search for tools and found dns-over-https. This tool uses Go (1.13 or newer) so it's not a big deal for me since I already use Go. Just clone the repo and compile and then execute doh-client (Go should be available on your system):
  • Kominfo can suck a huge one
    4 projects | /r/indonesia | 1 Dec 2021
    My suggestion: Choose providers that support DNSSEC or server with DoH written in Go (aka m13253). Or if you are interested in new technology, you can try providers that implement Knot Resolver (DoH2).
  • Unbound Now Supports Dns Over Https
    1 project | /r/pihole | 18 Feb 2021
    I concur, right now this method is a little convoluted unless the goal is to take advantage of an upstream VPS. This would only encrypt DNS traffic from the VPS to the requesting devices providing the requesting device also sets up a DoH client. It is way easier to just run an encrypted Wireguard or OpenVPN connection and get a full encryption versus DNS only. Wireguard or OpenVPN can be configured for DNS-only as well. Other methods of creating a DoH server can be done with https://github.com/m13253/dns-over-https/ and Nginx proxy.

dnsproxy

Posts with mentions or reviews of dnsproxy. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-24.
  • AdGuard Simple DNS Proxy with DoH, DoT, DoQ and DNSCrypt Support
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Apr 2024
  • Adguard adblocker vs Adguard DNS?
    1 project | /r/Adguard | 21 Jun 2023
    There's no difference between the free and freemium in regards to customizability while using VPN since both offer DoT endpoints. On Android, with the standard WireGuard & OpenVPN app you can use any DoT provider you want since the Android Private DNS setting takes precedence over the DNS settings in the VPN app. In Windows you can run https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy locally, that way the VPN won't intercept and modify the local DNS traffic (the DNS upstream still goes through the VPN, but if you use DoT/DoH/DoQ then it continues to the DNS server you prefer).
  • VPN recommendation with DoH or DoQ
    3 projects | /r/PrivacyGuides | 24 May 2023
    Which OS is this? In Android the Private DNS (DoT) setting is respected by some clients like the standard WireGuard & OpenVPN, so you can just load any provider's config and enter your personal DoT address. In iOS Passepartout can accept WG/OpenVPN config and apply custom DoH, as for desktop OS you can just run https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy forwarding to your DoH/DoQ address and set the VPN interface to use localhost as DNS.
  • Privacy threat: needing to choose between VPN and DNS
    1 project | /r/nextdns | 11 May 2023
    If it's on a desktop/laptop, you can run https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy to forward into your NextDNS DoH/DoT/DoQ, and set your VPN network adapter to use 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, ::1 and ::2 for DNS (the secondary entry either loopback or fail entirely, all it matters is your OS shouldn't try other address), that way since local traffic isn't routed by the VPN, you still get NextDNS (the actual DoH/DoT/DoQ traffic is still going through the VPN).
  • Adguard on windows blocking dns rewrite of adguard home
    1 project | /r/Adguard | 22 Apr 2023
    Why not set AdGuard Home (assuming it's indeed installed at your home) to use DoT/DoH/DoQ upstream (so your ISP can't redirect it) and have the rewrites in AGH too? If your AGH instance isn't at home, assuming you're using Windows 11 set your AGH to listen on DoH and set Windows to use DoH to your AGH. Otherwise use dnsproxy in Windows to forward it to your AGH through DoT/DoH/DoQ.
  • ISP di Indonesia sudah bisa deteksi penggunaan DNS over HTTPS/TLS?
    4 projects | /r/indonesia | 13 Apr 2023
  • Adguard Home and DNS-over-HTTPS
    1 project | /r/Adguard | 20 Mar 2023
    I'm not sure what is your plan here, do you need the Surfshark feature specifically, or do you just want to hide your traffic from your ISP? If you need Surfshark (perhaps for streaming geoblocked content or torrenting), then integrating it with AGH hosted on the cloud for device-wide traffic is going to be complicated. The Surfshark client doesn't support custom DoH/DoT address nor IPv6 (opening public IPv4 Do53 is a big no-no, you'll get swamped for DNS amplification attack), so you'll need an app running on your device to redirect DNS traffic like https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy to your cloud AGH. You'd need to setup DoH with a custom path through Nginx otherwise people would scan your server and use it, plus if Google's crawler sees the AGH login page it will mark it as deceptive, and your entire domain is blacklisted by the Safe Browsing API that's used on multiple products (Chrome, Firefox, AdGuard, NextDNS, etc). With all that hassle might as well just run AGH locally on your device anyway (local traffic isn't handled by VPNs)
  • Client Settings Cached?
    1 project | /r/AdGuardHome | 11 Mar 2023
    Assuming you have a custom upstream, it's by design
  • Feature Requests: Force use QUIC or DoQ Protocol, AnyCast/Ultralow toggle settings
    2 projects | /r/nextdns | 13 Feb 2023
    Since nextdns-cli isn't likely to support DoQ anytime soon, your best bet is dnsproxy and ctrld.
  • Feature Request: Different DoH per network i.e. different NextDNS per network.
    1 project | /r/firewalla | 28 Jan 2023

What are some alternatives?

When comparing dns-over-https and dnsproxy you can also consider the following projects:

dnscrypt-proxy - dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols.

Unbound - Unbound is a validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver.

DNS-over-HTTPS - An implementation of RFC 8484 - DNS Queries over HTTPS (DoH).

mosdns - 一个 DNS 转发器

nextdns - NextDNS CLI client (DoH Proxy)

doh-cf-workers - DNS-over-HTTPS proxy on Cloudflare Workers

bebasdns - Membantumu berselancar dengan aman dan tidak terbatas!.

jp.tiar.app - jp.tiar.app

pique - An advanced DNS stub with Freedom, Privacy and Security --- THRICE UPON A TIME

dns - Docker DNS server on steroids to access DNS-over-TLS from Cloudflare, Google, Quad9, Quadrant or CleanBrowsing

wirehole - WireHole is a combination of WireGuard, Pi-hole, and Unbound in a docker-compose project with the intent of enabling users to quickly and easily create a personally managed full or split-tunnel WireGuard VPN with ad blocking capabilities thanks to Pi-hole, and DNS caching, additional privacy options, and upstream providers via Unbound.