django-debug-toolbar VS pudb

The reason behind this splitting is that we can safely use packages and related settings only where we need. For example, this starter kit has the package django-debug-toolbar. This is only intended for your development environment and not for your production. This can be very risky if used in production because if your Django project encounters errors, all the debug info will be shown to the user which is a severe security risk. Similarly, for tracking errors in production, we're using Sentry which is not needed in our local environment since we already have django-debug-toolbar. For keeping these settings file separate so that they don't conflict with each other, the settings file is split for serving different environments.

django-debug-toolbar: https://github.com/jazzband/django-debug-toolbar

https://github.com/jazzband/django-debug-toolbar/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ABug

https://github.com/jazzband/django-debug-toolbar Allows you to check which sql queries are being run on your app. See if they are optimized first.

Perhaps try the django-debug-toolbar. It might be able to tell you what is causing the slow load time.

I would start with https://github.com/jazzband/django-debug-toolbar and figure out what causes the slowness.

-> The debugging above from django-debug-toolbar

Documentation, including installation and configuration instructions, is available at https://django-debug-toolbar.readthedocs.io/.

I simply use the superb pudb. Press ctrl+e to open the current file at the current line in your editor.

such a waste of time...

To this day, I'm baffled by the dynamic language folks who cannot get they head around how strictness/rigor (via a good expressive type system) actually makes maintenance easier and more importantly: cheaper.

[1] https://github.com/inducer/pudb

I use the very under-rated pudb in an adjacent terminal window.

I've been using PuDB for a while now.

I think it is also worth mentioning pudb here

Most of the time I simply use icecream (a much better version of print()), and sometimes, I use pudb (a visual debugger) for tougher/trickier bugs.

For a quick view etc I usually fire up pudb in an adjacent terminal window but for a detailed/heavy debugging session I fire up VS Code (with the vim plugin of course). I have used vi/vim for 37+ years now so it is part of my DNA and use VS Code only for it's great vim + debugging facility.

Two that I haven’t seen here and have saved me tons of time are pudb, a great debugger and petl a simple powerful ETL toolkit.

If you want to debug Python then pudb is simply superb. Vim users don't really want or need to "debug inside of vim" do they? We usually are happy to use multiple command line and other tools in adjacent windows. Also, you can just step around and view variables etc in pudb and then press ctrl+e to edit that file in vim, then q to restart debugger.