diesel_async VS cps

So I want to use diesel_async in my web backend.

The already linked discussion from last time already contains a lot of information about this. Diesel itself does not provide async operations and that will likely remain that way for a foreseeable future. At least my preferred solution is to keep async support in a separate crate. A prototype for this is currently available here. Keep in mind that this is not released yet, so there might be bugs everywhere. I plan to cut a first release of this crate after the final release of diesel 2.0, which means hopefully soon. As for ETA's: I generally do not give any ETA's for releases, as this is currently a free time project for me.

So, diesel is an ORM that tries to take full advantage of rust's typing expressivity to allow for statically checked, and fast, queries. I absolutely loved it when trying it out the first time.

i don't see why you or anyone else would consider it too big of an issue that Diesel doesn't have async. For those who really want async diesel right now, the author already released diesel_async as a stop-gap solution, but even without that there's nothing wrong with using spawn_blocking. It feels worse than it really is to use blocking thread pools; until io_uring is a thing, there's no real getting around the necessity of threads being blocked for I/O and so adding async to the mix doesn't magically make things faster.

As for now there is an prototype available here. It's technically feature complete, but depends on a unpublished diesel version + has some remaining bugs with certain mysql versions. If that is fixed I will likely publish a first alpha version officially. That can take same time because that's a second large project that needs maintenance time beside diesel itself and that's quite a lot to do in my free time. You can support this work by sponsoring me on github

Async support for diesel currently lives in a separate repository as there are language level blocking issues for publishing a version of this crate where we could commit to a stable release at all. See the corresponding diesel issue for details.

https://github.com/weiznich/diesel_async tho'.

Weiznich (the maintainer of Diesel) has created an experimental async version of the diesel Connection and RunQueryDsl traits, which should help with ease-of-use for Diesel within async contexts. It is not yet published on crates, but you can find it here: https://github.com/weiznich/diesel_async

This'll get you closer: https://github.com/nim-works/cps

Sorry, I was in a hurry.

- https://github.com/nim-works/cps

Or a neural network DSL or for a self-contained example, einsum:

There has been a more-or-less working CPS implementation for Nim for a few years now,

https://github.com/nim-works/cps

https://github.com/nim-works/cps/tree/master/docs

Nobody seems to care though, as it has gained no traction at all and it has been mostly ignored by the core team.

Ones that have not been mentioned so far:

nlvm is an unofficial LLVM backend: https://github.com/arnetheduck/nlvm

npeg lets you write PEGs inline in almost normal PEG notation: https://github.com/zevv/npeg

futhark provides for much more automatic C interop: https://github.com/PMunch/futhark

nimpy allows calling Python code from Nim and vice versa: https://github.com/yglukhov/nimpy

questionable provides a lot of syntax sugar surrounding Option/Result types: https://github.com/codex-storage/questionable

ratel is a framework for embedded programming: https://github.com/PMunch/ratel

cps allows arbitrary procedure rewriting to continuation passing style: https://github.com/nim-works/cps

chronos is an alternative async/await backend: https://github.com/status-im/nim-chronos

zero-functional fixes some inefficiencies when chaining list operations: https://github.com/zero-functional/zero-functional

owlkettle is a declarative macro-oriented library for GTK: https://github.com/can-lehmann/owlkettle

A longer list can be found at https://github.com/ringabout/awesome-nim.

I think the CPS attempt in Nim could do this

https://github.com/nim-works/cps

* Goroutines are probably a lot more easier to use. Work is being done to make Nim even better in that area: https://github.com/nim-works/cps but don't expect it soonish.

* I feel like Go has less 'edge cases', but the Nim compiler is steadily getting more stable, especially consider it's not backed up by a major company!

* Metaprogramming is really powerful, but not beginner friendly. The documentation says use macros when necessary, but personally I don't think that really happens in practice.

The advantages by far outweigh the disadvantages, especially if you are looking for a clean Go alternative(except maaaaaaybeee web application).

and the fifth: https://github.com/disruptek/cps