Zipline VS SFTPGo

I currently have a DigitalOcean droplet that's hosting Zipline which is a web server to receive ShareX uploads and host them. It took a little bit of work to get it set up as I have absolutely zero experience with Docker, but now I had an image uploader.

I use zipline. It's fast and easy to use. I have it set up in docker.

I use Zipline. It's a self-hosted ShareX server that you can also upload to from a web portal. It works with images, videos (any arbitrary file type, really) and even supports url shortening. It's served me pretty well when sharing things over Discord that are more than 8mb. This might be what you're looking for. Here's my docker-compose.yml file, assuming you have an existing docker network called "caddy_network":

Zipline - Image / text / file upload server

I've been using Zipline for shareX images and text, its worked pretty well for me and it has a nice webui

EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations from all of you!! I've chose to use the below: - Files: sftpgo - Calendar: baikal - Notes: memos (But beware, it sends opt-out telemetry) - Network folder: webdav on sftpgo

Give a try to SFTPGo

> Even these projects have gotten to a level of sophistication that it would implode without big tech support.

The worst thing is that all this FAANG or VC backed companies make a lot of people believe that they are the only viable way.

> Why do you think you don't see any interesting oss tech from hobbyists is these days?

Actually not true, just an example, https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo. But there are plenty of them.

This is possible using SFTPGo. The default Windows installer register SFTPGo as a Windows service. You can download the portable version and run it manually or install SFTPGo from the Scoop packages. You can use the built-in SFTPGo virtual permissions to only allow uploads. SFTPGo uses virtual users, no system users are required.

I suggest contacting your SFTP server vendor. I guess they have an auto blocking policy like this

Basically it's a file storage managed over HTTPS. Nextcloud is pretty heavy, that's the reason why I using just a single statically compiled cross-platform binary SFTPgo

Using SFTPGo you can easily configure read-only accounts. SFTPGo uses virtual users and virtual permissions. So you don't need to create system users for your SFTPGo users and you don't need to use chmod to make folders read-only (but the system user that SFTPGo runs as needs file system level permission to access the files/folders you want to share)

SFTPGo provides SFTP, FTP/S and HTTP/S so you can share the same files using different protocols and thus meet the different needs of your business partners. Allowed protocols can be enabled/disabled per-user

You could check out SFTPGo, it may meet your needs.