design
WASI
Our great sponsors
design | WASI | |
---|---|---|
32 | 45 | |
11,343 | 4,582 | |
0.2% | 2.4% | |
3.4 | 7.0 | |
2 months ago | about 2 months ago | |
Rust | ||
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
design
-
Reaching and surpassing the limits of JavaScript BigData with WebAssembly
With WebAssembly we can compile our C++ codebase into a wasm module for the browser. So when you look at a SciChart.js chart you're actually seeing our C++ graphics engine wrapped for JavaScript.
-
WASM Instructions
I should add, however, that the unmentioned elephant in the room is V8 JIT (TurboFan), which simply doesn't handle irreducible control flow. While there are some valid theoretical arguments around the current arrangement in Wasm, looking at the history of the associated discussions makes it pretty obvious that having V8 support Wasm and generate fast code similar to what it can do for asm.js was an overriding concern in many cases. And Google straight up said that if Wasm has ICF, they will not bother supporting such cases, so it will be done by a much slower fallback:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/796#issuecommen...
AFAIK no other Wasm implementation has the same constraint - the rest generally tend to desugar everything to jumps and then proceed from there. So this is, at least to some extent, yet another case of a large company effectively forcing an open standard to be more convenient for them specifically.
-
Supercharge Web AI Model Testing: WebGPU, WebGL, and Headless Chrome
https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/1397
> Currently allocating more than ~300MB of memory is not reliable on Chrome on Android without resorting to Chrome-specific workarounds, nor in Safari on iOS.
That's about allocating CPU memory but the GPU memory situation is similar.
-
Build your own WebAssembly Compiler
As far as I can tell (5 minutes of internet research) this was to allow easier compilation to JavaScript as a fallback in the days when WASM wasn't widely supported.
"Please add goto" issue has been open since 2016:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/796
Most interesting comment:
> The upcoming Go 1.11 release will have experimental support for WebAssembly. This will include full support for all of Go's features, including goroutines, channels, etc. However, the performance of the generated WebAssembly is currently not that good.
> This is mainly because of the missing goto instruction. Without the goto instruction we had to resort to using a toplevel loop and jump table in every function. Using the relooper algorithm is not an option for us, because when switching between goroutines we need to be able to resume execution at different points of a function. The relooper can not help with this, only a goto instruction can.
> It is awesome that WebAssembly got to the point where it can support a language like Go. But to be truly the assembly of the web, WebAssembly should be equally powerful as other assembly languages. Go has an advanced compiler which is able to emit very efficient assembly for a number of other platforms. This is why I would like to argue that it is mainly a limitation of WebAssembly and not of the Go compiler that it is not possible to also use this compiler to emit efficient assembly for the web.
^ https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/796#issuecommen...
-
Flawless – Durable execution engine for Rust
When I implemented a WASM compiler, the only source of float-based non-determinism I found was in the exact byte representation of NaN. Floating point math is deterministic. See https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/#why-is-there-no-fast-math-... and https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/main/Nondetermini....
-
Requiem for a Stringref
> To work with GC, you need some way to track if the GC'd object is accessible in WASM itself.
I've never heard of a GC with that kind of API. Usually any native code that holds a GC reference would either mark that reference as a root explicitly (eg. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/1459) or ensure that it can be traced from a parent object. Either way, this should prevent collection of the object. I agree that explicitly checking whether a GC'd object has been freed would not make any sense.
> The reason why you probably need a custom string type is so you can actually embed string literals without relying on interop with the environment.
WASM already has ways of embedding flat string data. This can be materialized into GC/heap objects at module startup. This must happen in some form anyway, as all GC-able objects must be registered with the GC upon creation, for them to be discoverable as candidates for collection.
Overall I still don't understand the issue. There is so much prior art for these patterns in native extensions for Python, PHP, Ruby, etc.
-
The Tug-of-War over Server-Side WebAssembly
Giving you a buffer that grows is the allocation approach I am talking about. This is not how your OS works. Your OS itself works with an allocator that does a pretty good job making sure that your memory ends up not fragmented. Because WASM is in between, the OS is not in control of the memory, and instead the browser is. The browser implementation of "bring your own allocator" is cute but realistically just a waste of time for everybody who wants to deploy a wasm app because whatever allocator you bring is crippled by the overarching allocator of the browser messing everything up.
It seems like the vendors are recognizing this though, with firefox now having a discard function aparently!
https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/1397
- How do Rust WebAssembly apps free unused memory?
- Hello World In Web Assembly
-
Bun v0.5
Scientific performance critical code isn't written in Python, it is written in C/C++ which is used by Python. Python in ML usually merely describes the calculation not unlike React describes the DOM that should be displayed in the browser.
JavaScript was never really known for admin or file manipulation (Perl replacement), so that was what probably established the dominant ecosystem for Python. I also don't think the runtime overhead is applicable due to native C/C++ part, and download time doesn't have to be bad since modules can be split just like in JavaScript ecosystem today. For an AI app, the model inference weights might be larger than the compiled WASM code itself. However, I'd agree with you that porting legacy apps might not be possible without something close to a rewrite.
There is a reasonable chance that once WASM GC is implemented, then direct DOM access will be provided [1], which I believe could pretty much halt interest in new JavaScript development for web frameworks overnight. WASM is the reincarnation of the Java Applet, but better. And a more typed language like Go or Dart could become the most widely used programming language. Either compile it to WASM as plugin for something like the browser, compile to JavaScript for "legacy browsers", or to native code for a standalone app. There are probably a handful of developers already assuming this and trying to write a version of React running in WASM already.
[1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/main/Web.md#gc
WASI
-
WASI 0.2.0 and Why It Matters
WASI Co-chair here. Nothing in WASI is "somehow blocked by Google", or indeed blocked by anyone at all. Graphics support in WASI hasn't been developed simply because nobody has put energy into developing graphics support in WASI.
At the end of 2023 we counted around 40 contributors who have been working on WASI specifications and implementations: https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/wasi/2023/... . That is a great growth for our project from a few years ago when that issue was filed, but as you can see from what people are working on, its all much more foundational pieces than a graphics interface. Also, if you look at who is employing those contributors, its largely vendors who are interested in WASI in the context of serverless. That doesn't mean WASI is limited to only serverless, but that has been the focus from contributors so far.
By rolling out WASI on top of the WASM Component Model we have built a sound foundation for creating WASI proposals that support more problem domains, such as embedded systems (@mc_woods and his colleagues are helping with this), or graphics if someone is interested in putting in the work. Our guide to how to create proposals is found here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/blob/main/Contributing.m... .
- WASI Launching Preview 2
-
Missing the Point of WebAssembly
> As I understand it, it's not even really possible today to make WebAssembly do anything meaningful in the browser without trampolining back out to JavaScript anyway, which seems like a remarkable missed opportunity.
That's the underlying messy API it's built on. There are specs to make the API more standardized like https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI
But overall, yeah, it feels like a shiny new toy everyone is excited about and wants to use. Some toys can be fun to play with, but it doesn't mean we have to rewrite production systems in it. Sometimes, or most of the time, toys don't become useful tools.
-
Running WASI binaries from your HTML using Web Components
Snapshot Preview 1 is the standard all tools are building to right now. The specification is available here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/blob/main/legacy/preview...
It's pretty unreadable though!
Preview 2 looks like it will be a big change, and is just being finalised at the moment. I'd expect that when preview 2 is available there will be an improvement in the quality of documentation. I'm not sure how long it will take after release for tools to start switching to it. I'd expect Preview 1 will still be the main target at least for the rest of this year.
-
WASI: WebAssembly System Interface
> Like WTF does this mean? The repo tells me nothing
Directly above the sentence you quoted:
"Interposition in the context of WASI interfaces is the ability for a Webassembly instance to implement a given WASI interface, and for a consumer WebAssembly instance to be able to use this implementation transparently. This can be used to adapt or attenuate the functionality of a WASI API without changing the code using it."
> and I've still yet to see a clear write-up about what WASI is.
In the same document: [0]
> WTF is wit?
The first link in that document ("Starting in Preview2, WASI APIs are defined using the Wit IDL.") is [1].
> I click on "legacy" and I see preview0 and preview1, which are basically unreadable proto-specs.
The README for the legacy directory [2] clearly explains what they are.
> Where's a single well-written WASI spec?
"Development of each API happens in its own repo, which you can access from the proposals list." [3]
> Whatever WASI is doing, I don't like it.
Clearly not - you've gone out of your way to ignore all of the documentation that answers your questions.
> And neither does AssemblyScript team apparently
The AssemblyScript team have a bone to pick with WASI based on their misunderstanding of what WASI is for (it is not intended for use on the web) and WASI's disinterest in supporting UTF-16 strings. You can see for yourself in [4].
[0]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/tree/main#wasi-high-leve...
-
A Gentle Introduction to WebAssembly
The Bytecode Alliance initiated a sub-project called the WebAssembly System Interface (WASI). WASI is an API that allows WebAssembly access to system features such as files, filesystems, Berkeley sockets, clocks, and random numbers. WASI acts as a system-level interface for WebAssembly, so incorporating a runtime into a host environment and building a platform is easier.
-
Spin 1.0 — The Developer Tool for Serverless WebAssembly
We are excited to contribute back to Wasmtime and the component model, as well as to new projects and proposals emerging in this space (such as new Wasm proposals, like WASI Preview 2, wasi-keyvalue, wasi-sql or wasi-cloud).
-
The Tug-of-War over Server-Side WebAssembly
I've been reading the following repositories.
https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/blob/main/Proposals.md
What are some alternatives?
content - The content behind MDN Web Docs
.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.
wave - Realtime Web Apps and Dashboards for Python and R
webgpu-wgsl-hello-triangle - An example of how to render a triangle with WebGPU using WebGPU Shading Language - the "Hello world!" of computer graphics.
interface-types
threads - Threads and Atomics in WebAssembly
Chevrotain - Parser Building Toolkit for JavaScript
wasi-libc - WASI libc implementation for WebAssembly
iswasmfast - Performance comparison of WebAssembly, C++ Addon, and native implementations of various algorithms in Node.js.
node-sqlite3 - SQLite3 bindings for Node.js
WebViewFeedback - Feedback and discussions about Microsoft Edge WebView2
gpuweb - Where the GPU for the Web work happens!