Deeplearning4j
julia
Our great sponsors
Deeplearning4j | julia | |
---|---|---|
13 | 350 | |
13,408 | 44,469 | |
0.3% | 0.8% | |
6.5 | 10.0 | |
15 days ago | 1 day ago | |
Java | Julia | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Deeplearning4j
- Deeplearning4j Suite Overview
- Java for ML?
-
Best way to combine Python and Java?
Have you considered migrating off of Python to just using JVM ML libraries then? I hear good things about Deeplearning4j, but there's quite a few.
-
Anybody here using Java for machine learning?
I've gone to the linux workflow as directed in the docs and reconstructed the maven command line:
-
Data Science Competition
DL4J
-
Java Matrix Benchmark is Updated! See how linear algebra libraries compare for speed
Hey folks, just letting you know we see this thread and I appreciate you guys running these benchmarks. I'm not seeing any of your posts on our forums. I think I saw a notification from our examples but we do not actually monitor that. Please use: https://community.konduit.ai/ or at least the main repo dl4j issues: https://github.com/eclipse/deeplearning4j/issues and you'll get a lot more visibility. Thanks!
-
Does Java has similar project like this one in C#? (ml, data)
Also, the website is now redirected to: https://deeplearning4j.konduit.ai/
-
If it gets better w age, will java become compatible for machine learning and data science?
On top of this several popular projects have been built. This includes tensorflow-java and our project eclipse deeplearning4j: https://github.com/eclipse/deeplearning4j
-
Matrices multiplication benchmark: Apache math vs colt vs ejml vs la4j vs nd4j
Nd4j is actively developed. The latest commit was 6 hours ago. Nd4j is part of deeplearning4j which is now owned by eclipse (but the main contributors are from a company) https://github.com/eclipse/deeplearning4j/tree/master/nd4j
julia
-
Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
34. Julia - $74,963
-
Optimize sgemm on RISC-V platform
I don't believe there is any official documentation on this, but https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/49430 for example added prefetching to the marking phase of a GC which saw speedups on x86, but not on M1.
-
Dart 3.3
3. dispatch on all the arguments
the first solution is clean, but people really like dispatch.
the second makes calling functions in the function call syntax weird, because the first argument is privileged semantically but not syntactically.
the third makes calling functions in the method call syntax weird because the first argument is privileged syntactically but not semantically.
the closest things to this i can think of off the top of my head in remotely popular programming languages are: nim, lisp dialects, and julia.
nim navigates the dispatch conundrum by providing different ways to define free functions for different dispatch-ness. the tutorial gives a good overview: https://nim-lang.org/docs/tut2.html
lisps of course lack UFCS.
see here for a discussion on the lack of UFCS in julia: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/31779
so to sum up the answer to the original question: because it's only obvious how to make it nice and tidy like you're wanting if you sacrifice function dispatch, which is ubiquitous for good reason!
- Julia 1.10 Highlights
-
Best Programming languages for Data Analysis📊
Visit official site: https://julialang.org/
-
Potential of the Julia programming language for high energy physics computing
No. It runs natively on ARM.
julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 1.9.3 Commit bed2cd540a1 (2023-08-24 14:43 UTC) Build Info: Official https://julialang.org/ release
-
Rust std:fs slower than Python
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/51086#issuecomment...
So while this "fixes" the issue, it'll introduce a confusing time delay between you freeing the memory and you observing that in `htop`.
But according to https://jemalloc.net/jemalloc.3.html you can set `opt.muzzy_decay_ms = 0` to remove the delay.
Still, the musl author has some reservations against making `jemalloc` the default:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2018/04/23/2
> It's got serious bloat problems, problems with undermining ASLR, and is optimized pretty much only for being as fast as possible without caring how much memory you use.
With the above-mentioned tunables, this should be mitigated to some extent, but the general "theme" (focusing on e.g. performance vs memory usage) will likely still mean "it's a tradeoff" or "it's no tradeoff, but only if you set tunables to what you need".
-
Eleven strategies for making reproducible research the norm
I have asked about Julia's reproducibility story on the Guix mailing list in the past, and at the time Simon Tournier didn't think it was promising. I seem to recall Julia itself didnt have a reproducible build. All I know now is that github issue is still not closed.
-
Julia as a unifying end-to-end workflow language on the Frontier exascale system
I don't really know what kind of rebuttal you're looking for, but I will link my HN comments from when this was first posted for some thoughts: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31396861#31398796. As I said, in the linked post, I'm quite skeptical of the business of trying to assess relative buginess of programming in different systems, because that has strong dependencies on what you consider core vs packages and what exactly you're trying to do.
However, bugs in general suck and we've been thinking a fair bit about what additional tooling the language could provide to help people avoid the classes of bugs that Yuri encountered in the post.
The biggest class of problems in the blog post, is that it's pretty clear that `@inbounds` (and I will extend this to `@assume_effects`, even though that wasn't around when Yuri wrote his post) is problematic, because it's too hard to write. My proposal for what to do instead is at https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/50641.
Another common theme is that while Julia is great at composition, it's not clear what's expected to work and what isn't, because the interfaces are informal and not checked. This is a hard design problem, because it's quite close to the reasons why Julia works well. My current thoughts on that are here: https://github.com/Keno/InterfaceSpecs.jl but there's other proposals also.
-
Getaddrinfo() on glibc calls getenv(), oh boy
Doesn't musl have the same issue? https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/34726#issuecomment...
I also wonder about OSX's libc. Newer versions seem to have some sort of locking https://github.com/apple-open-source-mirror/Libc/blob/master...
but older versions (from 10.9) don't have any lockign: https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/Libc/blob/Libc-99...
What are some alternatives?
Deep Java Library (DJL) - An Engine-Agnostic Deep Learning Framework in Java
jax - Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs: differentiate, vectorize, JIT to GPU/TPU, and more
Weka
NetworkX - Network Analysis in Python
tensorflow - An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
Lua - Lua is a powerful, efficient, lightweight, embeddable scripting language. It supports procedural programming, object-oriented programming, functional programming, data-driven programming, and data description.
Smile - Statistical Machine Intelligence & Learning Engine
rust-numpy - PyO3-based Rust bindings of the NumPy C-API
Pytorch - Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration
Numba - NumPy aware dynamic Python compiler using LLVM
Apache Mahout - Mirror of Apache Mahout
F# - Please file issues or pull requests here: https://github.com/dotnet/fsharp