dbeaver VS autocomplete

Yes but not in the community version:

https://github.com/dbeaver/dbeaver/wiki/Schema-compare

DBeaver is a veteran SQL client. In addition to basic visualization and management capabilities, it has a SQL editor, data and schema migration capabilities, monitor database connections, and more. It supports a full range of databases (both SQL and NoSQL). DBeaver is also hooked up with GPT-3, which converts your natural language to SQL.

If you want to do something meaningful, here's the DBeaver GitHub repo https://github.com/dbeaver/dbeaver. Go contribute a ChatGPT plugin & update the UI to look nicer.

dbeaver is an excellent option as well, plus it supports basically every kind of SQL database in existence.

Curiously enough, just yesterday a snap broke on me. People on the github thread said reverting snap didn't work either - I'm not sure whether they simply couldn't revert, or they reverted and still had issues, as I just saw this and slapped on the flatpak instead of messing with my snap. I'm also not sure whether the snap revert didn't work because of something the dbeaver team screwed up there as well, however I'll make sure to avoid automatic/unattended updates in the future. I'm running Arch on my personal machine anyway, so it's not like I mind running updates regularly, but I'd rather do it at my own discretion.

Please create a ticket and describe your issue here: https://github.com/dbeaver/dbeaver/issues/new/choose

I did find https://github.com/dbeaver/dbeaver/issues/6064 marked as closed, perhaps that will help?

Having contributed to the Fig autocomplete specs, I find this sad. The Amazon product Fig was built into basically works as replacement, which is good. Still, the core value of this product are the open-source autocomplete specs: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete. What's going to happen to that? It looks like they are still using it in the Amazon product. It should definitely be possible for an open-source re-implementation of the Fig UI to use those specs. There is a lot of knowledge encoded in there!

8. Fig

Fig is awesome but with signups blocked[1] for 2+mo already it's also as good as dead ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

* [1]: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete/issues/2068

https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete is it this?

How is this different than https://fig.io/?

AWS CloudWatch Evidently The worst. No comment. AWS seems to perpetually lack a good DX for developers. It appears that they don't recognize or continually undervalue the importance of roles other than engineers, such as Product Managers or Designers. Very disappointing. However, AWS has recently acquired Fig, so looks like they're now pursuing an acquisition strategy instead. Let's see how it turns it out, and let's hope they don't ruin Fig, since it's such an useful tool.

slightly tangential, but where do people get awesome landing pages like linear(https://fig.io/. has similar landing page) etc. Do they build them in-house or buy templates somewhere? Many of the recently launched YC companies have awesome landing pages. eg. https://automorphic.ai/,

I love this product, have contributed several times to it, and I'm a little torn. One thing I am thinking about now, is that the completion specs are MIT-licensed, and it should be possible to use them to re-implement a basic open-source version of the autocompletion product... https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete