datadog-agent VS ckb

It's worse than that, they want security through obscurity too. They feel like someone is inappropriately tinkering with the agent they want customers to install. It's open source: https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent ...but the downloads are behind a login: https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent#datadog-agent

Serverless developers have the benefit of cloud providers deploying new features which improve our experience and reduce costs. Recently AWS introduced Graviton for Lambda, which leverages their custom ARM-based processor. Using Graviton, AWS says that users can see 19% better performance at 20% lower cost - and many users wouldn't even have to change any of their code at all! At my day job at DataDog, we quickly rolled out ARM-compatible versions of the DataDog Extension and our IaC integrations like the Serverless Plugin and the CDK Construct.

The package is at https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tree/6.37.1 and it seems to relay on downloads rather than vendored packages (https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/blob/6.37.1/go.mod)

The worse is when many are intermixed, and usually glued together in unconventional ways. Like https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent where there's a go, c++, and python build.

There are open-source alternatives that are much smaller. Depending on your model, this one might work for you: https://github.com/ccMSC/ckb

Corsair mice have a community driver (https://github.com/ccMSC/ckb) to setup rgb and so, but I am not a fan of the hardware itself.

Somehow in the Linux world, it is expected that random people on the Internet should have any old piece of hardware working just as well the companies that made the hardware, took your money, and paid a team to develop the software for Windows. For the most part, they do, sometimes even nicer than the official software.