daphne VS uvicorn

For example, there are the servers: Daphne: https://github.com/django/daphne Uvicorn: https://www.uvicorn.org/ Hypercorn: https://pgjones.gitlab.io/hypercorn/index.html

So now we test if the application is working by running the application with uvicorn. Command has this format: uvicorn .:

Using a simple uvicorn hello world application, I was unable to replicate your case. Using the Dockerfile from your tutorial, and the example.py code from the uvicorn front page, along with your CMD, I got:

If you look at the printout after launching the app, you'll notice that Shiny is using Uvicorn under the hood. This is a common way of containerizing apps using FastAPI deployments.

You can scale with application server, by adding more processes to server requests. I use Gunicorn with Uvicorn workers.

There is also uvicorn

When writing a web app with FastAPI, using async/await and a library like uvicorn, the GIL is less of an issue as we are primarily IO bound.

Nginx is a pretty typical frontend for Python WSGI apps, since it pairs easily with Gunicorn, but I would recommend checking out Envoy and Uvicorn, which are more modern and pretty awesome.

The recommended mode to run Starlette applications is under Uvicorn.

To run the server, you will also need to install Uvicorn:

Uvicorn — This is an ASGI web server that will serve our FastAPI application in production