danger-js VS architecture_decision_record

Make sure to not accept any Pull Request with commented ESLint errors to ensure a continuous improvement of your codebase quality. Some tools can help you to automate this part of the review, such as Danger JS.

commitlint & dangerjs. Linters that help maintain consistency in all user-provided information related to Git and GitHub (commits, branch names, PR titles, etc.).

Does your team use any automatic code formatting or linting tools? E.g. for TypeScript or JavaScript, a combination of Prettier and ESLint, with a well understood and agreed-upon configuration, can avoid this kind of back and forth. Danger.js is a good way to handle the higher level concerns that cannot be addressed at the syntax level.

This tool is run in our CI pipeline for every PR and the result is shown in the Github PR (it uses Danger behind it).

I'm translating the Architecture Decision Record project to more languages. I'm seeking advice and guidance please: how are you all managing translations of git repos of content such as documentation and markdown files?

My experiments so far are here:

https://github.com/sixarm/locale-help

My work-in-progress is to create a top level directory `./locales`, then subdirectories per language using a ISO 639-1 two-letter language code, then content directories, for example:

./locales/en/hello/ (this is in English)

./locales/es/hola/ (this is in Español a.k.a. Spanish)

What do you use to track which content directories correspond to each other across languages?

The Architecture Decision Record repo is now mostly auto-translated into Spanish, French, Welsh, and Korean, in the top level directory `./locales`, using the program `slug-case` to help translate the markdown content file headlines into directory names:

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record

Link is https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision...

Hi, article author here, we supplement our architecture diagrams with Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision... in the ADR we capture:

Architecture decision record by joelparkerhenderson

If anyone wants to see Polar in action on a GitHub issue, I'm experimenting with Polar on my Architecture Decision Record repo:

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision...

(I'm on the fence about the value of Polar for this kind of issue... see what you think)

This method is only slightly formalized as ADR (architecture decision record). What I personally like about templates that people share on the interned (https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record) it that if force designed to actually consider cons of selected approach or honestly attempt to analyze alternatives.

The GitHub repo joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record is a good source to get an overview of tools, articles and examples.

GitHub is prompting me to add a git successor to my open source repo, in case I die.

Do people here have advice about how to do this, or experience in doing it?

Any brainstorms about how to do it across all the related repos, orgs, etc., such as a will, or well-known file in the repo, that donates to a nonprofit, or foundation, etc.?

Here's the repo:

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record

Architecture Decision Records are a big help for teamwork. I have a bunch of notes and examples here, including from my time at ThoughtWorks with technology radars.

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision...

If you want to get started with ADR, I recommend looking at the repository, where you can find different ADR templates and examples of how to use them.