cv VS image-png

Rust can absolutely be used without unsafe to create some of the fastest code out there, but you need to try and use data-oriented design where possible to make things flow smoothly and avoid runtime checks. The hardest thing to use data-oriented design for, in my opinion, is graphs. I find that actor systems can be used instead of graphs, but it is difficult. Generally I end up using slotmap to make multiple arenas and then putting them into one large object with lots of methods to operate on the graph structure. If you want an example of that, this is probably the most complicated code I have made this way: https://github.com/rust-cv/cv/blob/511024feaa077a9af377cca7b654ad3d57d3bd6a/cv-sfm/src/lib.rs. It may not be entirely helpful to understand the whole codebase, but if you are curious to see how I do graphs in Rust with slotmap, this can be a good reference.

This is a nice guide, but ultimately openCV should be rewritten in rust. It would avoid all of these headaches. Please checkout and support https://github.com/rust-cv/cv

It is, more or less, my first larger rust project. It uses the opencv crate, but I only recommend to have a look at rust-cv instead! It uses SQLite/sqlx for storing the matchings, actix-web for serving the webview and a lot of rayon for parallel processing.

You may want to take a look at our project Rust CV https://github.com/rust-cv/cv.

Encoding images to PNG with the "fast" compression mode is now an order of magnitude faster. This is achieved using a custom Zlib compression implementation that leverages assumptions about the patterns in PNG data to get reasonable compression ratios at phenomenal speeds.

However, the latest release of the png crate - published less than a day ago - has an ultrafast compression mode that's slightly faster than the QOI reference implementation at a comparable compression ratio. So basically you get the properties of QOI in a much more widely used image format.

In other areas, miniz_oxide is faster than miniz, Symphonia is faster than ffmpeg on most codecs, the not-yet-announced zune-png beats both libpng and the more heavily optimized libspng, and the png crate is getting considerable improvements too and also beats libpng.

gif, png, zune-jpeg are on par with their C counterparts in terms of performance

Fun fact: libpng-sys was so difficult to create safe Rust wrapper for that people just wrote their own, 100% safe Rust PNG decoder: https://github.com/image-rs/image-png

I didn't get time to finish the full spec for my attempt at a PNG decoder but it was working on common cases and was faster than image-png at the time https://users.rust-lang.org/t/new-rust-png-decoding-library/30952. I suspect it's not the case anymore since it changes it's deflate crate usage. Here is the perf issue on the image crate https://github.com/image-rs/image-png/issues/114. My code was way simpler than the one in the image crate so that might still be worth a read if you are interested.

The crate actually forbids unsafe. There's nothing necessarily wrong with unsafe code, but not having it provides a nice assurance. Plus if you are willing to tolerate (well audited) unsafe code then you may well be better off just using libpng.