ctop
glances
Our great sponsors
ctop | glances | |
---|---|---|
37 | 101 | |
15,127 | 24,869 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 9.5 | |
6 months ago | 2 days ago | |
Go | Python | |
MIT License | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ctop
-
Lazydocker
This does remind me of ctop as well: https://github.com/bcicen/ctop
It also let's you look at containers, resource usage graphs, their logs and even do some actions through a TUI.
-
Portainer Business Edition 5 free nodes plan will change to 3 nodes in the future.
ssh, nnn, micro and ctop is all I need on my dockerhosts
- Ctop – Top-like interface for container metrics
-
Found an amazingly handy terminal UI for both docker and docker-compose. Have actually just added the bin to my git repo with all my compose files. Great for a quick look at what is going on host machines.
My problem with ctop is, that it seems to show wrong memory usage data: https://github.com/bcicen/ctop/issues/314
- FLaNK Stack Weekly 3 April 2023
-
Portainer Alternatives?
When talk about interface and cli... I am a huge fan of ctop
-
What do you think about Portainer?
You can use CTOP. It's like a lite portainer on CLI. You can check logs, stats, restart containers.
-
Ask HN: What is the best source to learn Docker in 2023?
In the terminal, there are also a few useful projects:
- for Docker, there is ctop: https://github.com/bcicen/ctop
-
Docker 2.0 went from $11M to $135M in 2 years
> I tried portainer, awful UX experience and all good features are inside paid version.
This is interesting to me, because it doesn't quite match my experience - I've been using Portainer for around 3 years at this point and it's been pretty decent.
The worst issues that I've gotten is networking issues in some hybrid configurations with Docker Swarm (e.g. Portainer cannot reach the manager node of the cluster for a bit), or troubles configuring Traefik ingresses when managing Kubernetes (though I think the recent patch notes talked about improving the ingress section, so maybe the experience will get better with non-Nginx ingresses).
Other than that, it's been great for onboarding new people, illustrating the cluster state at a glance, easily operating with stacks and scaling/restarting services as needed, including pulling new images, viewing the logs or even connecting to containers through a web UI if need be. The webhook functionality in particular is really nice - you can just do a curl request against a given URL and that will pull the new container versions for the given image and do a redeploy, which works nicely with a variety of CI solutions.
When I last tried, initializing Nomad clusters with networking encryption was a bit less of a smooth experience (needing to essentially manage your own PKI) and the web UI felt more like a dashboard, instead of something that you could click around in, if you're a proponent of that workflow.
Rancher is probably better than both of those options, though there's a certain overhead in regards to running both that software and a full Kubernetes cluster. If Kubernetes feels like a good fit for a particular project and resources aren't an issue, definitely check it out! You can, of course, also have some success with lightweight clusters, like K3s: https://k3s.io/
I'll definitely agree that Lazydocker is a nice tool, but I wouldn't call it superior, just different (TUI vs GUI), their demo video is nice though: https://youtu.be/NICqQPxwJWw
It actually reminds me of ctop, which you might also want to check out, though it's not something that you'd manage clusters in, merely the individual containers on a node (which won't always be enough, same as Docker Compose isn't): https://github.com/bcicen/ctop
Regardless, for Kubernetes, I'm inclined to say that you'd enjoy k9s a bunch then, it has a similar TUI approach: https://k9scli.io/
-
Looking for a simple Docker dashboard
However, something like ctop may be easier to use.
glances
-
Homelab Adventures: Crafting a Personal Tech Playground
Glances
-
Easily monitor your Server from anywhere
As is from their github repository.
-
Pyenv – lets you easily switch between multiple versions of Python
If I pin a version of Python, isn't that going to wreck any tooling that depends on it? Unless you're saying have multiple versions of Python installed.
This is practically the only remaining annoyance I have with the Python ecosystem (relative imports aside). I use some tools, like Glances [0] whose formula relies on a much newer version (3.12) than the actual package requires (3.8) [1].
So when there's a Python update, all of those update as well. I thought I'd fixed this with pipx, but in a way that's worse, because the venvs it builds depend on a specific version of Python existing, which doesn't work well with brew always wanting to upgrade it.
I want a stable, system-level Python that I don't touch, don't add packages to, and which only exists as a dependency for anything that needs it. If an update would break a package I have installed (due to Python library deprecation, etc.), it should warn me before updating. Otherwise, I don't care, as long as any symlinks are taken care of.
Separately, I want a stable, user-level Python that I can do whatever I want to. Nothing updates it automatically. I can accomplish this by compiling Python and using `make altinstall`, but if there's a better way, I'd love to hear about it.
[0]: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/20e744191e74d...
[1]: https://github.com/nicolargo/glances
- Hard disk LEDs and noisy machines
-
Glances for monitoring OPNsense
Wanting to get Glances installed on OPNsense for its integration into homepage.
- Any metrics dashboard out there for viewing power usage???
-
Are there an alternative to htop that lets me see the total resource usage per app?
I don't try but maybe glance https://github.com/nicolargo/glances
-
Dashboard with all container resource usage?
In the meantime Glances is a pretty good way to keep an eye on CPU and memory usage of all your containers. You can either run it as a lightweight docker image or as a native application on your host.
- [Docker] Surveillance du réseau de conteneurs Docker?
-
[Docker] Docker -Container -Netzwerküberwachung?
Bearbeiten: Dies war, was ich war: [https://github.com/nicolargo/glances weise(https://github.com/nicolargo/glances)
What are some alternatives?
Plausible Analytics - Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics alternative to Google Analytics.
bpytop - Linux/OSX/FreeBSD resource monitor
colima - Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
btop - A monitor of resources
go-dry - DRY (don't repeat yourself) package for Go
bashtop - Linux/OSX/FreeBSD resource monitor
minify - Go minifiers for web formats
Netdata - The open-source observability platform everyone needs
csvtk - A cross-platform, efficient and practical CSV/TSV toolkit in Golang
bottom - Yet another cross-platform graphical process/system monitor.
git-time-metric - Simple, seamless, lightweight time tracking for Git
homarr - Customizable browser's home page to interact with your homeserver's Docker containers (e.g. Sonarr/Radarr)