css-loader VS Nuxt.js

@fbem/css-loader is very similar to css-loader (and actually a fork of it) and has almost the same set of options and functionality. You can even use it with different style preprocessors by simply chaining loaders together in webpack config. But be sure to pick up if you need them 😏.

Css files need a css loader like https://github.com/webpack-contrib/css-loader. In fact I see you already have 2 css loaders in your normal webpack config. the server config needs those too. Your fronted build and server build will be very similar in that regard.

React comes by default with css module support via https://github.com/webpack-contrib/css-loader, which is stable and not deprecated. (Note that this entirely independent of react)

I have enabled CSS modules within webpack.config in my React application so that I can locally scope CSS files to individual components. I'm also trying to use the TabView component from PrimeReact. When I do so the themes from PrimeReact are not applied. If I create a separate project and do not enable CSS modules the themes apply correctly.

this is technically a feature of css-loader and not of nextjs, next just supports it ootb through their webpack config. iirc its this option you need to customize

const config = { mode: isProdBuild ? 'production' : 'development', devtool: isProdBuild ? 'source-map' : 'cheap-module-eval-source-map', entry: { app: `${SRC_DIR}/index.js`, }, optimization: { minimize: isProdBuild, sideEffects: true, }, context: SRC_DIR, stats: { colors: true, hash: true, timings: true, assets: true, chunks: false, chunkModules: false, modules: false, children: false, warnings: true, }, module: { rules: [ transpileJavaScriptRule(mode), loadWebWorkersRule, loadShadersRule, ], }, resolve: { // Which directories to search when resolving modules modules: [ // Modules specific to this package path.resolve(__dirname, '../node_modules'), // Hoisted Yarn Workspace Modules path.resolve(__dirname, '../../../node_modules'), SRC_DIR, ], // Attempt to resolve these extensions in order. extensions: ['.js', '.jsx', '.json', '*'], // symlinked resources are resolved to their real path, not their symlinked location symlinks: true, }, plugins: [ new webpack.DefinePlugin({ /* Application */ 'process.env.NODE_ENV': JSON.stringify(process.env.NODE_ENV), 'process.env.DEBUG': JSON.stringify(process.env.DEBUG), 'process.env.APP_CONFIG': JSON.stringify(process.env.APP_CONFIG || ''), 'process.env.PUBLIC_URL': JSON.stringify(process.env.PUBLIC_URL || ''), 'process.env.VERSION_NUMBER': JSON.stringify(PACKAGE.version || ''), 'process.env.BUILD_NUM': JSON.stringify(BUILD_NUM), /* i18n */ 'process.env.USE_LOCIZE': JSON.stringify(process.env.USE_LOCIZE || ''), 'process.env.LOCIZE_PROJECTID': JSON.stringify(process.env.LOCIZE_PROJECTID || ''), 'process.env.LOCIZE_API_KEY': JSON.stringify(process.env.LOCIZE_API_KEY || ''), /* XNAT dev */ 'process.env.XNAT_PROXY': JSON.stringify(process.env.XNAT_PROXY || ''), 'process.env.XNAT_DOMAIN': JSON.stringify(process.env.XNAT_DOMAIN || ''), 'process.env.XNAT_USERNAME': JSON.stringify(process.env.XNAT_USERNAME || ''), 'process.env.XNAT_PASSWORD': JSON.stringify(process.env.XNAT_PASSWORD || ''), }), ], // // Fix: https://github.com/webpack-contrib/css-loader/issues/447#issuecomment-285598881 // // For issue in cornerstone-wado-image-loader // node: { // fs: 'empty', // }, };

One possible non-JSS solution is css-modules supported in css-loader. That requires some setup which may get convoluted if you need CSS preprocessors or SSR.

✨ css loader 💥 jss 🌟 csjs ☄️ aphrodite

Before we start, you should have a minimum knowledge of webpack, you should have css-loader. Along this article, I use nuxt for example, but you can use React or Angular.

The above should work in Create React App out of the box. If you are rolling your own Webpack configuration (may God have mercy on your soul), you'll need to configure modules with a compileType of icss:

According to Node Package Manager (NPM), Next.js has about 3.9 million weekly downloads while Nuxt.js has about 438,000. Although Next.js has a significantly higher number of weekly downloads, Nuxt.js still has a robust number of users. We can conclude that both frameworks are relevant and will stand the test of time.

Nuxt team themselves pointed that out [in first release](https://www.npmjs.com/package/nuxt/v/0.0.1) as well as you can see that statement in [Nuxt's wikipedia article](https://cdn.domin.pro/K2Qa). I completely agree with how Nuxt is better for an amount of features.

Node is basically back-end Javascript. While powerful alone, almost exclusively you will use a back-end framework like Next.js or Gatsby when using React, and then maybe Nuxt or Gridsome in Vue.

Both Vue.js and React have their own set of tools and libraries to help developers build and maintain their applications. Vue.js has Vue CLI and Nuxt.js, while React has Create React App and Next.js.

Nuxt.js is a free and open-source JavaScript framework based on Vue.js that helps you develop modern web applications using SSR (server-side rendering) which provides a faster load, better SEO (search engine optimization), and better caching capabilities.

We made a LiveChat Next.js App template. Using Next.js as a foundation for the project, we have a front-end app with built-in routing, Server Side Rendering (SSR), and Server Side Generation (SSG) built with React, but on top of that, ready-to-use API routes built in the form of Serverless functions. If you prefer Vue.js or Svelte, you can choose similar frameworks, like Nuxt.js and SvelteKit.

Not oc, but maybe give Nuxt a look?

Vue's docs are some of the best I've ever read. Nuxt and Craft are pretty great too. I especially like how Craft's docs are bifurcated into the docs which give you the 20/80 + code snippets, and the class reference, which is complete documentation of every method, type, param, etc of the platform.

Nuxt - the Vue alternative to NextJS - supports both static site generation and SSR.