csharplang
F#
DISCONTINUED
Our great sponsors
csharplang | F# | |
---|---|---|
262 | 26 | |
10,779 | 2,199 | |
1.1% | - | |
9.6 | 0.0 | |
4 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
C# | F# | |
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
csharplang
- Discriminated Unions: Essa feature faz falta no CSharp
-
DevDocs
Certain parts of Microsoft Learn are permissive, for example the .NET BCL documentation is Creative Commons Attribution: https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet-api-docs as is ASP.NET Core: https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs (a good hint if documentation is permissively licensed and on GitHub is if there's an edit button at the top.)
The C# language specification is unfortunately a bit fuzzier: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/discussions/4855
The updated unified C# language specification is CC, but it's still catching up to modern C#: https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard
-
The golden age of Kotlin and its uncertain future
No OP, but for example you still see the C# folks still struggling to add discriminated unions to the language because of complex interactions due to its too many features[1]. Virtual threads are easier to use than async/await is another example.
-
.NET 8 – .NET Blog
Hi there. I'm the language designer who created the 'Collection Expression' design/specification: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/5354
You can see the entire history of the proposal there. To answer you specific question, we went with `..` because that's what the language already uses for the complimentary 'pattern matching deconstruction' form for collection patterns.
In other words, you can already say this today:
if (x is [var start, .. var middle, .. var end]) { ... }
-
What's new in C# 12: overview
Great improvements.
There is PolySharp project that enables you to use most of C#11 features in legacy .NET Framework: https://github.com/Sergio0694/PolySharp - Seems that C#12 features are planned to be implemented: https://github.com/Sergio0694/PolySharp/issues/78
I'm using PolySharp where I'm stuck with .NET Framework 4.6 and I don't have any issues.
Hope one day I'd see concise syntax for catch and/or try expressions: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/discussions/2734 - but there is a lot of resistance.
You must specify concrete type.
There was a plan to have "natural type" so "var list = [1,2,3]" would be of type "List" but it was postponed to C# 13 (https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/5354#issuecommen...)
-
Robust Design through Value Objects in C#
While C# currently lacks direct support for this kind of functionality, there's a glimmer of hope with an active proposal under discussion that aims to bring this feature to the language. This potential addition promises a future where C# can natively offer similar robust type narrowing.
-
The combined power of F# and C#
Given few people anticipated ValueTuple and C# adding a more direct tuple syntax, I feel like it is only a matter of time before C# adds discriminated unions.
(There are multiple proposals tracking the idea. This seems the most comprehensive and "central": https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/7016)
-
Interceptors (new C# metaprogramming feature) to fuel DapperAOT development
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/7009
[Proposal]: Interceptors #7009
> An interceptor is a method which can declaratively substitute a call to itself instead of a call to an interceptable method at compile time. This substitution occurs by having the interceptor declare the source locations of the calls that it intercepts. This provides a limited facility to change the semantics of existing code by adding new code to a compilation (e.g. in a source generator).
- How Much Memory Do You Need to Run 1M Concurrent Tasks?
F#
-
old languages compilers
F# F*
-
From Script to Scaffold in F#
This year I've been attempting Advent of Code in my favourite programming language, F#. This is a beginner(ish) centered post about making incremental changes from the smallest possible solution to something more robust.
-
The comeback of the Fediverse and the Old Web
I have many less followers on Mastodon than in the Birdsite (40 vs 341), yet my activity has generated many more interactions than there. Not only that, among the users who decided to interact with me I counted: a co-discoverer of the Laniakea supercluster, one of the lead developers behind F#, the author of many important books on Java & JVM, plus many others. I'm literally a nobody, but this time there was no algorithm relying on relevance and engament metrics to decide what to present to each one of us.
-
Chicago and London TDD Styles for Functional Programming
FP devs differ based on language here. Elm, like F#, tends to encourage "a bunch of functions and types in a file". While Elm supports modules, we don't really care where it came from; they're all pure, all deterministic, the compiler tells us if it works.
-
Performance of immutable collections in .NET
The builtin fsharp collections actually are just "immutable", not persistent as you mention. (Ref: https://github.com/fsharp/fsharp/blob/master/src/fsharp/FSharp.Core/map.fs. This is just an AVL tree that returns a copy on mutations: https://github.com/fsharp/fsharp/blob/577d06b9ec7192a6adafefd09ade0ed10b13897d/src/fsharp/FSharp.Core/map.fs#L118)
-
Coming from Scala
You can dive into .NET ecosystem by trying F#. It's functional-first language so this should be familiar.
-
Parsing Lambda Error Logs in ReScript & Python
ReScript code is just like F# or OCAML; it doesn’t have a function parse phase like JavaScript, so we have to define our functions and types first before we can use them. That’s fine, but makes explaining the code backwards (meaning you start at the bottom of the file and work your way up), so we’ll start at our lambda handler and explain each part, regardless of where it’s defined.
-
Please put units in names
F# is a JavaScript and .NET language for web, cloud, data-science, apps and more.
-
25 Years of Friendship
Here is link number 1 - Previous text "F#"
OCaml family of languages like F#, Reason
What are some alternatives?
ClojureCLR - A port of Clojure to the CLR, part of the Clojure project
julia - The Julia Programming Language
Roslyn - The Roslyn .NET compiler provides C# and Visual Basic languages with rich code analysis APIs.
Nemerle - Nemerle language. Main repository.
VisualFSharp - The F# compiler, F# core library, F# language service, and F# tooling integration for Visual Studio
Bridge.NET - :spades: C# to JavaScript compiler. Write modern mobile and web apps in C#. Run anywhere with Bridge.NET.
IronScheme - IronScheme
Fable - The project has moved to a separate organization. This project provides redirect for old Fable web site.
language-ext - C# functional language extensions - a base class library for functional programming
jOOQ - jOOQ is the best way to write SQL in Java
scala - Scala 2 compiler and standard library. Bugs at https://github.com/scala/bug; Scala 3 at https://github.com/scala/scala3
FunScript - F# to JavaScript compiler with JQuery etc. mappings through a TypeScript type provider