crowdsec VS Wazuh

Have you heard of https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec? It seems like a good fit.

Hey we actually built the second part as a product. Its a modern revamp of fail2ban combined with crowdsourcing aspect to deliver an up-to-date blocklist of active threats. You can check it out at https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec

Today we are pleased to announce the launch of CrowdSec Engine 1.5 - this is a huge milestone for the project and one that would not have been possible without the help of this community. You can read see the full change log over on GitHub here https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/releases

wget https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/releases/latest/download/crowdsec-release.tgz server:> tar xzvf crowdsec-release.tgz https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/releases/latest/download/crowdsec-release.tgz server: > tar xzvf crowdsec-release.tgz server:> cd crowdsec-v* && sudo ./wizard.sh -i

This tool crowdsec.net is really interesting to mitigate and enact defense systems for different scenarios.

CrowdSec is licensed under MIT open source license, you can find a copy of the text here: “Copyright 2020, CrowdSec SAS (http://crowdsec.net), Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the “Software”), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.” That’s all there is to it. Like in the case of Debian, you can do anything you want with it, for free, period. You just need to embed this license when you redistribute the product.

You should check out https://crowdsec.net. More advanced, uses crowdsources cti to block attacks even before they happen. Also both nginx and captcha is supported. Disclaimer: I am head of community. Visit /r/CrowdSec or our Discord at https://discord.gg/crowdsec if you have questions :-)

Do I need something like crowdsec, or is WireGuard secure enough on its own?

There's Wazuh[0][1], but it's more of an XDR (i.e. anti-virus) and SIEM solution than what Wiz is offering.

[0] https://wazuh.com/

[1] https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh

To manage these events, we need to have an appropriate system called SIEM (Security Information and Event Management). One of the best open-source solutions is Wazuh.

There is currently no feature for excluding specific SCA rules however this feature has been requested here and would be added to the roadmap for future releases.

I use Wazuh instead. Greenbone CE is severely limited and requires payment for anything beyond the very basic. Super simple installation more features.

Seems like something that should be documented somewhere more official than a random reddit post for sure. Added it to https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/1112 for good measure.

Hmm, I've really been wanting to try Wazuh but since all our endpoints (Win10/11) are running a German locale I've run into https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/16842 when checking the compliance checks (CIS benchmarks) on a test installation of 4.6.

Monitoring & Active Measures - Exporting firewall events to an external time-series database like I describe above is good to see who is touching your firewall or accessing your web site. Using an Intrusion Detection System / Intrusion Prevention System (IDS/IPS) such as open-source Suricata, which is a free package on pfSense, and deploying file system integrity monitoring, such as the open-source Wazuh on the exposed server are also good approaches to protecting yourself.

We are actively working on enhancing the system to allow users to mark vulnerabilities as "not vulnerable" or hide them. You can track the progress of this enhancement on the following GitHub issue: (Enhancement - Mark Vulnerabilities as Not Vulnerable).