cpplinks VS cppcoro

For more compilers correctness* resources see https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/compilers.correctness.md

As for linkers and loaders, see https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/executables.linking_loading.md

More: https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/atomics.lockfree.memory_model.md

Take the red pill and see how deep the rabbit hole goes... https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/ https://github.com/shafik/cpp_learning

Further readings: Book recommendations in https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/compilers.md#books as well as program analysis resources (in particular lattice theory, type systems and programming languages theory, related notation): https://gist.github.com/MattPD/00573ee14bf85ccac6bed3c0678ddbef#program-analysis-resources

Microarchitectural performance analysis research is a pretty active and interesting area--see also: https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/performance.tools.md#microarchitecture

For more on GDB see: https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/debugging.md#gdb

FWIW, here are general C++20 Talks -- and more feature-specific talks: coroutines, modules.

Compiler courses: https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/compilers.md#courses

coroutines as they exist are a lower level construct which is vastly better with a higher level library to make it usable for programmers. One such library is cppcoro but at some stage we'll see an equivalent in the standard library.

Seems like there is a better maintained fork of cppcoro: https://github.com/andreasbuhr/cppcoro