Cppcheck VS Experimental Boost.DI

Compare Cppcheck vs Experimental Boost.DI and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Cppcheck Experimental Boost.DI
11 8
5,389 1,087
- 1.5%
9.9 3.1
4 days ago 6 months ago
C++ C++
GNU General Public License v3.0 only -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Cppcheck

Posts with mentions or reviews of Cppcheck. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-04.
  • Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
    3 projects | dev.to | 4 Mar 2024
    I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end.
  • Enforcing Memory Safety?
    3 projects | /r/cpp | 7 Jun 2023
    Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.
  • Check out my tasks.json for C++ of VScode
    5 projects | /r/cpp_questions | 21 May 2023
    Also check out (cppcheck)[https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck] if you want more static analysis
  • What are the must-have tools for any C++ developer?
    3 projects | /r/cpp | 5 Jan 2023
    My browser refuses to open that link. This is better: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck
  • Awesome Penetration Testing
    124 projects | dev.to | 6 Oct 2021
    cppcheck - Extensible C/C++ static analyzer focused on finding bugs.
  • C/C++ pre-commit hooks for static analyzers and linters
    9 projects | /r/cpp | 13 Sep 2021
    and five C/C++ static code analyzers: * clang-tidy * oclint * cppcheck * cpplint (recently added!) * include-what-you-use (recently added!)
  • C Deep
    80 projects | dev.to | 27 Feb 2021
    Cppcheck - Static analysis tool. Despite the name, works well with C. GPL-3.0-or-later

Experimental Boost.DI

Posts with mentions or reviews of Experimental Boost.DI. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-18.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cppcheck and Experimental Boost.DI you can also consider the following projects:

cpplint - Static code checker for C++

kangaru - 🦘 A dependency injection container for C++11, C++14 and later

gcc-poison - gcc-poison

stb - stb single-file public domain libraries for C/C++

cmake-lint - Fork of https://github.com/richq/cmake-lint to continue maintenance

c-smart-pointers - Smart pointers for the (GNU) C programming language

American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer

ZXing - ZXing ("Zebra Crossing") barcode scanning library for Java, Android

C++ Format - A modern formatting library