coverlet
unit-test
Our great sponsors
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
coverlet
-
Setting up a simple testing project with C#
You might have noticed when you were looking in NuGet, there was a package called coverlet installed into the project:
-
Do you use any code coverage tool on your project?
There are a lot libraries to collect code coverage, one of this one is Coverlet: https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet
-
Code Coverage for Build Server without Visual Studio Enterprise
We use Coverlet. You have to do some work to get it working with your tests but I have no complaints. I don't know for sure if it works with VS Community, but since it plugs into MSBuild I'm not sure how it could be gated to that.
-
How to define the same folder for merging test coverage?
And I would like to build a total test coverage for the solution. So, I added coverlet.msbuild to the dependencies and executed the next command from the examples of coverlet
-
Analyzing and enforcing .NET code coverage with coverlet
CoverletOutputFormat: The format of the report that coverlet will generate (opencover, cobertura, json). More here;
- Code coverage and warnings for modified files only
-
Generating Code Coverage Metrics for .NET Framework Applications
Utilize Coverletand Report Generator utilities – however, this is where its funny, because these are .NET CLI tools that need the .NET 6 SDK installed.
-
Code coverage for Asp.net 6 web APIs
Coverlet works really well.
-
Why does VSTest put the output of data collectors to GUIDed subdirectories?
However, I am hesitant to do so. Whenever it seems I have to fight the tools that are provided for me this is a likely sign that I’m Doing Things Wrong because of some fundamental misunderstandings and misassumptions on my part. I did some digging and found that VSTest by design forces the placement of data collectors’ output into GUIDed subdirectories, see Coverlet documentation, Coverlet issue #500 and VSTest issue #2378. That this is forced by design reinforces my worries that I’m doing something counterproductive.
-
Code Coverage Tool For XUnit
Coverlet
unit-test
-
Some useful Libraries for .NET projects
I wrote about this library in my last articleTools o improve your unit test with .NET. I have a Github repository about Unit Test and I used this library for test ([Unit Test]https://github.com/JessicaNathany/unit-test) the code ist portuguese but I will write in english.
-
Tools o improve your unit test with .NET
Links Unit Test project in Github Mock4 Quickstart NBuilder GitHub Faker.NET NBuilder documentation XUnitCodeSnippets Link package Moq coverlet.msbuild coverlet-coverage
What are some alternatives?
ReportGenerator - ReportGenerator converts coverage reports generated by coverlet, OpenCover, dotCover, Visual Studio, NCover, Cobertura, JaCoCo, Clover, gcov or lcov into human readable reports in various formats.
Ocelot - .NET API Gateway
Cobertura - Cobertura
CacheManager - CacheManager is an open source caching abstraction layer for .NET written in C#. It supports various cache providers and implements many advanced features.
CodeCoverageSummary - A GitHub Action that reads Cobertura format code coverage files and outputs a text or markdown summary.
Bogus - :card_index: A simple fake data generator for C#, F#, and VB.NET. Based on and ported from the famed faker.js.
RunCoverletReport - A Visual Studio 2019 Extension to run Coverlet and Report Generator
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
faker-cs - C# port of the Ruby Faker gem (http://faker.rubyforge.org/)
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
pytest - The pytest framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing