coturn VS ice

Both TURN and STUN can be self hosted, the most popular project i have found is coturn

# TURN server name and realm realm=DOMAIN server-name=turnserver # Use fingerprint in TURN message fingerprint # IPs the TURN server listens to listening-ip=0.0.0.0 # External IP-Address of the TURN server external-ip=IP_ADDRESS # Main listening port listening-port=3478 # Further ports that are open for communication min-port=10000 max-port=20000 # Log file path log-file=/var/log/turnserver.log # Enable verbose logging verbose # Specify the user for the TURN authentification user=turnuser:turn456 # Enable long-term credential mechanism lt-cred-mech # If running coturn version older than 4.5.2, uncomment these rules and ensure # that you have listening-ip set to ipv4 addresses only. # Prevent Loopback bypass https://github.com/coturn/coturn/security/advisories/GHSA-6g6j-r9rf-cm7p #denied-peer-ip=0.0.0.0-0.255.255.255 #denied-peer-ip=127.0.0.0-127.255.255.255 #denied-peer-ip=::1

I am trying to deploy coturn server in the Kubernetes cluster.

That is an excellent use case for a webrtc server rather than an usual voice communication. If you decide to go that way, you don't need any sim card. You just need an internet access. You install a webrtc client (the usual one is coturn). I don't know if you also need to set up some kind of chat server in addition.

I've found this issue for you: https://github.com/coturn/coturn/issues/492

If you host yourself on a VPS you can hook in coturn (it's enabled by the linked playbook by default):

https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/b...

https://github.com/coturn/coturn

You're welcome! If this is for mission-critical or commercial use, you will want to invest in a good TURN server to ensure a reliable connection between peers. You can either self-host your own Coturn server or pay for a service like Twilio. But if this is just a hobby project, you can just use the free Open Relay Project.

schema.sql - coturn - GitHub

I tried http://turnserver.open-sys.org/ and cloning the GitHub repository, but I got the same results.

NetBird and Netmaker are similar in their capabilities and mesh offering, the same goes for Tailscale, but if we compare technical implementations, Netbird relies on the ICE and STUN protocols to discover the best path for p2p connectivity between peers. These are open WebRTC protocols with battle-tested software around them. Similarly, we use TURN for securely relaying traffic, when a p2p connection isn't possible (hard NAT). This protocol also comes from the WebRTC world and has stable and popular implementations like Coturn.

Heads up to folks from Pion https://github.com/pion/ice.

Sixth, NetBird supports MFA and popular OpenID-compliant Identity Providers (IdP) like MS Azure, Okta, Google, Auth0, Keycloak, Zitadel, Authentik, etc. Available in the self-hosted version as well.

Seventh, NetBird is a European company headquartered in Berlin, Germany. Hence this might interest local European companies looking for local networking platforms.

Eighth, NetBird joined the CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security incubator - the #1 cybersecurity research university. The program gives us direct access to cutting-edge research that we will use to optimize the technology.

Basically yes. The difference would be that we are trying to use more open source technologies and libraries instead of implementing our own. For example pion/ice from the WebRTC project and coturn for STUN and TURN. Both ice and coturn are used to go around NAT. We lack a peer management system that will allow to add peers dynamically. Tailscale and Zero tier have it but not open sourced. We plan to implement such a system and open source it.