coturn VS ice

Compare coturn vs ice and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
coturn ice
25 2
10,423 390
1.7% 3.1%
8.6 8.5
6 days ago 6 days ago
C Go
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of coturn. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-16.


Posts with mentions or reviews of ice. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-04.
  • NetBird raises €1.1M – Open-Source P2P WireGuard-based overlay network
    3 projects | | 4 May 2023
    Heads up to folks from Pion

    Sixth, NetBird supports MFA and popular OpenID-compliant Identity Providers (IdP) like MS Azure, Okta, Google, Auth0, Keycloak, Zitadel, Authentik, etc. Available in the self-hosted version as well.

    Seventh, NetBird is a European company headquartered in Berlin, Germany. Hence this might interest local European companies looking for local networking platforms.

    Eighth, NetBird joined the CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security incubator - the #1 cybersecurity research university. The program gives us direct access to cutting-edge research that we will use to optimize the technology.

  • If you ever struggled setting up Wireguard with peers behind NAT and without a public ip
    3 projects | /r/selfhosted | 25 May 2021
    Basically yes. The difference would be that we are trying to use more open source technologies and libraries instead of implementing our own. For example pion/ice from the WebRTC project and coturn for STUN and TURN. Both ice and coturn are used to go around NAT. We lack a peer management system that will allow to add peers dynamically. Tailscale and Zero tier have it but not open sourced. We plan to implement such a system and open source it.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing coturn and ice you can also consider the following projects:

peerjs - Simple peer-to-peer with WebRTC.

stunner - A Kubernetes media gateway for WebRTC. Contact: [email protected]

awesome-compose - Awesome Docker Compose samples

netbird - Connect your devices into a single secure private WireGuard®-based mesh network with SSO/MFA and simple access controls.

Remotely - A remote control and remote scripting solution, built with .NET 8, Blazor, and SignalR.

edumeet - edumeet - multiparty web-meetings using mediasoup and WebRTC

turn - A pure Rust implementation of TURN

mirotalk - 🚀 WebRTC - P2P - Simple, Secure, Fast Real-Time Video Conferences Up to 4k and 60fps, compatible with all browsers and platforms.

Remotely - A remote control and remote scripting solution, built with .NET Core, SignalR Core, and WebRTC.

pusher-http-python - Pusher Channels HTTP API library for Python

pwnat - The only tool/technique to punch holes through firewalls/NATs where multiple clients & server can be behind separate NATs without any 3rd party involvement. Pwnat is a newly developed technique, exploiting a property of NAT translation tables, with no 3rd party, port forwarding, DMZ, DNS, router admin requirements, STUN/TURN/UPnP/ICE, or spoofing.

node-turn - Node-turn is a STUN/TURN server for Node.JS