coq-serapi
Ceras
Our great sponsors
| coq-serapi | Ceras | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 123 | 474 | |
| - | - | |
| 8.1 | 0.0 | |
| 8 days ago | 4 months ago | |
| OCaml | C# | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
coq-serapi
-
Translating My Z3 Tutorial to Coq
It's a question I hadn't really considered before. On first pass, as far as I know, I'd say the answer is no. It isn't clear to me what the objective of embedding Coq with a C api for example would be. The very core of Coq is about verifying proofs and not producing them and I'm not sure what the benefit of embedding it is.
Having said that there are a few projects that may be something like what you're asking. First off, Coq has the SerAPI project https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-serapi through which external programs can talk to coq. This has been used for example to make a python OpenAi gym like interface https://github.com/princeton-vl/CoqGym.
A different direction might be something like MetaMath Zero https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10703 which is intended to be a small and fast verifier for it's language, perhaps maybe someday for embedding in applications. There is this notion of "Proof Carrying Code" which I don't really know what the current state of the art is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-carrying_code One might want an easily embeddable trusted verifier for that purpose. I don't know.
Ceras
-
Does godot have a high-performance serialization tool similar to unity odin?
After some searching, I finally settled on Ceras. It works just as well out of the box as the Odin serializer. I compared the two with the same generated data. Ceras is faster, but generates larger files, Odin is much slower to read, but about 3/5 the size of Ceras. Each has advantages and disadvantages. I am now a new godot developer and am very happy.
-
any good binary serializers that are not assembly dependent
So the answer is no, there aren't. If you want to add that kind of security risk to your application you can use ceras
What are some alternatives?
coq - Coq is a formal proof management system. It provides a formal language to write mathematical definitions, executable algorithms and theorems together with an environment for semi-interactive development of machine-checked proofs.
MessagePack for C# (.NET, .NET Core, Unity, Xamarin) - Extremely Fast MessagePack Serializer for C#(.NET, .NET Core, Unity, Xamarin). / msgpack.org[C#]
sexp-grammar - Invertible parsing for S-expressions
Protobuf.NET - Protocol Buffers library for idiomatic .NET
bs-json - Compositional JSON encode/decode library for BuckleScript
LiteNetLib - Lite reliable UDP library for Mono and .NET
Coqtail - Interactive Coq Proofs in Vim
QuikGraph - Generic Graph Data Structures and Algorithms for .NET
Json.NET - Json.NET is a popular high-performance JSON framework for .NET
JsonSubTypes - Discriminated Json Subtypes Converter implementation for .NET
Bois - Salar.Bois is a compact, fast and powerful binary serializer for .NET Framework. With Bois you can serialize your existing objects with almost no change.
Hyperion - Polymorphic serialization for .NET