copilot
Obsidian
Our great sponsors
| copilot | Obsidian | |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 1 | |
| 589 | 40 | |
| 1.9% | - | |
| 9.0 | 0.0 | |
| about 1 month ago | almost 6 years ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
copilot
- NASA Copilot: A stream-based runtime-verification framework
-
[ANN] Copilot 3.16
[2] https://github.com/Copilot-Language/copilot/releases/tag/v3.16
- [ANN] NASA's Ogma 1.0.9
- [ANN] NASA's Ogma -- now with FPrime support
- [ANN] NASA's Ogma 1.0.7
-
[ANN] Summer Internship at NASA Ames Research Center
The student, if selected, will be working on extending our capabilities to test cFS/ROS/FPrime applications, especially those using Ogma and/or Copilot for monitoring. Both Ogma and Copilot are open-source software written in Haskell.
-
I want to learn Haskell, but...
For low-level embedded, you have Copilot!
-
[ANN] Copilot 3.12
Current emphasis is on improving the codebase in terms of stability and test coverage, removing unnecessary dependencies, hiding internal definitions, and formatting the code to meet our new coding standards. Users are encouraged to participate by opening issues and asking questions via our github repo (https://github.com/copilot-language/copilot).
- [ANN] Copilot 3.11
-
Copilot: Realtime Programming Language and Runtime Verification Framework
not maintainer but I think the correct one is this: https://github.com/Copilot-Language/copilot/tree/master/copi...
Obsidian
-
Is there any hard evidence that functional programming is better?
It got them 11 votes up. I asked to actually make this argument and received -4. Both sides of the claim are false, the left witnessed by things like Copilot and Obsidian, the right by the criticism of the functional style by Jon Harrop. If this is what you mean by «that is the point most of the comments tried to make» then, well, they should try harder if intellectual honesty and integrity are sought at all.
What are some alternatives?
cFS - The Core Flight System (cFS)
really-simple-xml-parser - A really simple xml parser in Haskell using Parsec
C-structs - C-Struct Types for Haskell
toml-parser - Haskell parser and printer for the TOML 1.0.0 file format
declarative-programming-streams - Active streaming declarative programmers. See who's online at the following URL:
resin - Resin: high performance variable binder and ast manipulation lib
improve - An imperative programming language in Haskell for high assurance embedded applications. ImProve programs are verified with model checking. ImProve compiles to C and Simulink.
hfmt - Format Haskell programs. Inspired by the gofmt utility.
fret - A framework for the elicitation, specification, formalization and understanding of requirements.
bash
ogma
alga