containers-roadmap VS aws-lambda-runtimes-performance

Compare containers-roadmap vs aws-lambda-runtimes-performance and see what are their differences.

containers-roadmap

This is the public roadmap for AWS container services (ECS, ECR, Fargate, and EKS). (by aws)

aws-lambda-runtimes-performance

AWS Lambda Performance comparison (by Aleksandr-Filichkin)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
containers-roadmap aws-lambda-runtimes-performance
80 2
5,137 110
0.6% -
2.0 0.0
9 months ago about 2 years ago
Shell Java
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

containers-roadmap

Posts with mentions or reviews of containers-roadmap. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-28.

aws-lambda-runtimes-performance

Posts with mentions or reviews of aws-lambda-runtimes-performance. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-24.
  • The Case for C# and .NET
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Jul 2022
  • AWS Lambda Cold Start Times
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Oct 2021
    > NodeJs is the slowest runtime, after some time it becomes better(JIT?) but still is not good enough. In addition, we see the NodeJS has the worst maximum duration.

    The conclusion drawn about NodeJS performance is flawed due to a quirk of the default settings in the AWS SDK for JS compared to other languages. By default, it opens and closes a TCP connection for each request. That overhead can be greater than the time actually needed to interact with DDB.

    I submitted a pull request to fix that configuration[0]. I expect the performance of NodeJS warm starts to look quite a bit better after that.

    [0]: https://github.com/Aleksandr-Filichkin/aws-lambda-runtimes-p...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing containers-roadmap and aws-lambda-runtimes-performance you can also consider the following projects:

eks-nvme-ssd-provisioner - EKS NVMe SSD provisioner for Amazon EC2 Instance Stores

Fable.Remoting - Type-safe communication layer (RPC-style) for F# featuring Fable and .NET Apps

kube-fledged - A kubernetes operator for creating and managing a cache of container images directly on the cluster worker nodes, so application pods start almost instantly

flyctl - Command line tools for fly.io services

netshoot - a Docker + Kubernetes network trouble-shooting swiss-army container

CleanArchitecture - Clean Architecture Solution Template for ASP.NET Core

kraken - P2P Docker registry capable of distributing TBs of data in seconds

piku - The tiniest PaaS you've ever seen. Piku allows you to do git push deployments to your own servers.

juicefs - JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top of Redis and S3.

apollo-client - :rocket:  A fully-featured, production ready caching GraphQL client for every UI framework and GraphQL server.

MongoDB - The Official MongoDB Node.js Driver