connections-tui
dotfiles
| connections-tui | dotfiles | |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| - | - | |
| 3.3 | 7.9 | |
| 16 days ago | about 2 years ago | |
| Go | Shell | |
| - | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
connections-tui
-
Evaluating GPT5's reasoning ability using the Only Connect game show
NYT Connections definitely has less red herrings than Only Connect's wall (and doesn't have the pressure of the timer, either...), but the quality has gone up significantly in the past year and half.
If anyone wants to try, I actually built a command line player of the NYT Connections game here: https://github.com/jleclanche/connections-tui (for some definition of the word "I")
- 6 Weeks of Claude Code
- Show HN: Play NYT Connections in the Terminal
dotfiles
-
Why AI hasn't replaced software engineers, and won't
https://xkcd.com/1319/
I think there will be a lot of this going on for the first few years, till everyone remembers this:
https://xkcd.com/1205/
-
Benedict Evans: AI eats the world (Spring 26) [pdf]
> Automation takes a lot of manual labour
That's a great quote.
https://xkcd.com/1205/
-
So where are all the AI apps?
I posted it recently, but now this works differently https://xkcd.com/1205/
You can get a throw away app in 5 mins, before I wouldn't even bother.
-
Jemalloc Un-Abandoned by Meta
exactly. I can think of at least 5 different projects I have been on where a better allocator would made a world of difference. I can also think of another 5 where it probably would have been a waste of time to even fiddle with.
but as usual there is an xkcd for that. https://xkcd.com/1205/
One project I spent a bunch of time optimizing the write path of I/O. It was just using standard fwrite. But by staging items correctly it was an easy 10x speed win. Those optimizations sometimes stack up and count big. But it also had a few edges on it, so use with care.
-
100 hour gap between a vibecoded prototype and a working product
https://xkcd.com/1205/ (is it worth the time matrix)
LLM's change the calculus of the above chart dramatically.
-
The Xkcd thing, now interactive
On an unrelated note, AI completely changed economics of https://xkcd.com/1205/
Previously I'd postpone some tooling since I'd lost more time on it (unless it's something I wanted to learn anyway), but now I'm all in.
-
Will vibe coding end like the maker movement?
> The central promise—that distributed digital fabrication would bring manufacturing back to America, that every city would have micro-factories, that 3D printing would decentralize production—simply didn’t materialize.
There are plenty of products now that only exist because of what it did deliver on. Any one who spends time in the niche communities where it is thriving can see that... On the low end look at Apollo automation, the story of Grismo Knives, at the high end look a Hadrian Manufacturing.
Vibe coding is a terrible name, but what a skilled dev can do with a deeply integrated AI coding assistant is amazing. It changes the calculus of "Is it worth your time" (see: https://xkcd.com/1205/ ).
Is it helpful in my day to day: it sure is. Is it far more helpful in doing all the things that have been on the back burner for YEARS? My gods yes! But none of that is matching the hype thats out there around "vibe coding".
-
LLM=True
In my experience, it's the old time-invested vs time-saved trade off. If you're not looking at these reams of output often enough, the incentive to figure out all the flags and configs for verbosity to write these script is lower: https://xkcd.com/1205/
And because these issues are often sporadic, doing all this would be an unwanted sidequest, so humans grit their teeth and wade through the garbage manually each time.
With LLMs, the cost is effectively 0 compared to a human, so it doesn't matter. Have them write the script. In fact, because it benefits the LLM by reducing context pollution, which increases their accuracy, such measures should be actively identified and put in place.
-
AI Added 'Basically Zero' to US Economic Growth Last Year, Goldman Sachs Says
Absolutely, as per the xkcd automation chart, you'll break even if you save yourself those 5 minutes of work even just once a month over 5 years.
https://xkcd.com/1205/
-
Software Engineering Is Back
Dead wrong.
Because the world is still filled with problems that would once have been on the wrong side of the is it worth your time matrix ( https://xkcd.com/1205/ )
There are all sorts of things that I, personally, should have automated long ago that I threw at claud to do for me. What was the cost to me? Prompt and a code review.
Meanwhile, on larger tasks an LLM deeply integrated into my IDE has been a boon. Having an internal debate on how to solve a problem, try both, write a test, prove out what is going to be better. Pair program, function by function with your LLM, treat it like a jr dev who can type faster than you if you give it clear instructions. I think you will be shocked at how quickly you can massively scale up your productivity.
What are some alternatives?
claude-loop
planckforth - Bootstrapping a Forth interpreter from hand-written tiny ELF binary. Just for fun.
claude-code-to-adium
commandjobs - Command Jobs uses AI to help software engineers find the best jobs
langroid - Harness LLMs with Multi-Agent Programming
cv-aas - My CV-as-a-Service, because the world needs more SaaS.