conftest VS tfsec

I wrote following conftest.dev (OPA), sample policy

name: tf-plan-apply on: pull_request: branches: [ main ] env: TF_VERSION: 1.0.0 CONFTEST_VERSION: 0.28.3 WORKING_DIR: ./ jobs: terraform: name: aws-eureka-pairs-etc-s3 runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v2 - name: Install conftest run: | wget -O - 'https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/download/v${{ env.CONFTEST_VERSION }}/conftest_${{ env.CONFTEST_VERSION }}_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz' | tar zxvf - ./conftest --version //❶ - name: Setup Terraform uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v1 with: terraform_wrapper: false //❷ terraform_version: ${{ env.TF_VERSION }} cli_config_credentials_token: ${{ secrets.YOUR_CRED_NAME}} - name: Terraform Init ${{ env.WORKING_DIR }} working-directory: ${{ env.WORKING_DIR }} run: terraform init - name: Terraform Plan ${{ env.WORKING_DIR }} if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} working-directory: ${{ env.WORKING_DIR }} id: plan run: terraform plan -out=tfplan -no-color -lock=false -parallelism=50 - name: Convert terraform plan result to json formmat if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' id: convert working-directory: ${{ env.WORKING_DIR }} run: terraform show -json tfplan > tfplan.json - name: conftest test if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' id: conftest run: ./conftest test --no-color ${{ env.WORKING_DIR }}/tfplan.json //❸

Workload configuration should be audited regularly (Kics, Kubeaudit, Kubescape, Conftest, Kubesec, Checkov)

Insert Conftest! As they state in their GitHub description, Conftest tests against structured configuration data using the Open Policy Agent Rego query language. In the case of Terraform, this means we're actually running unit tests against sample JSON and actual tests against the Terraform state JSON.

While Rego is the policy language we use to assemble our policies, we still need something to run those policies with. If you have a cluster and you want to actively evaluate policies, you can end up running an instance of Open Policy Agent and it's associated tooling. However in our case, we just want to check things at runtime (or just on some recurring basis such as when changes get checked in or a pull request is submitted). In the latter instance, we are able to use another tool from the Open Policy Agent project called ConfTest. What ConfTest allows us to do is to specify a file or directory of files that we want to inspect along with the set of policies we want to inspect them with. It then takes all of that and dumps out the associated outputs from those policies and tell us the results (i.e. the messages, how many policies were checked and the results of those policies). This tool is much better suited for our use case, so this is what we will proceed with. To grab the latest version of ConfTest, you can grab the latest release from here.

OR HOW TO RUN https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest AS CI/CD in Circle CI to apply policies?

If you like terraform-compliance, Conftest might also be worth having a look. It has its own DSL to write policies, and allows you to test multiple frameworks. We found this blog post from Lennard Eijsackers very informative, and would thus rather recommend you to check it out.

Can Gatekeeper and Conftest single-source the same set of rules? I'm looking at https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/issues/54#issuecomment-528988831 and not seeing how.

Using pre-commit framework with terraform repository, will help your code to be kept clean, formated, updated document and checked for tf security issues (optional with tfsec) before committing and pushing the code to git source.

Here again more than one tool exists to assist. We will highlight two of the most popular ones here: tfsec and checkov. Both provide a predefined set of checks that they use to inspect your code, allowing to explicitly open exceptions (if you really want to) by annotating your code with comments, and adjust the configuration to ignore some modules, for example.

An additional benefit of using a CI workflow is adding automated tests. In this scenario, I’ve added a step leveraging tfsec to scan for static code vulnerabilities. In the example below, tfsec warns against creating an Azure network security rule which is fully open. This will halt and fail the workflow unless I provide an ignore comment to accept the warning.

· Provision an EKS Cluster (AWS) · Terraform v15.0 · Terraform Registry · Pre-Commit · Terraform Pre-commit · Terraform-docs · Tflint · Tfsec

Using terraform, create a skeleton directory that they can review for how EC2 instances should be created. Use tools like https://github.com/tfsec/tfsec or other scanners/linters to validate that your developers followed this process and didn't uncheck something.

I know tfsec (https://github.com/tfsec/tfsec) which is pretty good for AWS resources but I think vSphere resources are not implemented.

tfsec/tfsec (Go): 🔒🌍 Static analysis powered security scanner for your terraform code