community VS sops

Multiple container runtimes are supported, like conatinerd, cri-o, or other CRI compliant runtimes.

More recently, the Kubernetes SIG Network has been evolving the Gateway API to support service meshes.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/calendar/ https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/governance.md https://github.com/kubernetes/steering https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-list.md

According to this doc it takes the average of CPU utilization of a pod (average across the last 1 minute) divided by the CPU requested by the pod. Then it computes the arithmetic mean of all the pods' CPU.

metrics-server has not supported kubectl top Resource Metrics API

With the Gateway API being a superset of the Ingress API, it might make sense to consolidate both. Thanks to the SIG Network community, Gateway API is still growing and will soon be production ready.

Projects in/around Kubernetes and the CNCF are generally where I spend what little time I can these days. Most communities are incredibly welcoming and provide timely feedback. But the problem space of "managing a cloud platform" can take several years to really wrap ones head around, setting aside focused topics via SIGs like networking, storage, observability, API design, etc.

Krew is a plugin manager maintained by the Kubernetes Special Interest Group (SIG) CLI community. Krew makes it easy to use kubectl plugins and helps you discover, install, and manage them on your machine. It is similar to tools like apt, dnf, or brew. Today, over 200 kubectl plugins are available on Krew - and that number is only increasing. Some projects are actively used and some get deprecated over time, but are still accessible via Krew.

[1] https://k8s.devstats.cncf.io/d/9/companies-table?orgId=1&var-period_name=Last%20decade&var-metric=contributions [2] https://kubernetes.io/releases/release/ [3] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/governance.md [4] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-list.md

Mozilla SOPS (Secrets OPerationS) is an open-source command-line tool for managing and storing secrets. It uses secure encryption methods to encrypt secrets at rest and decrypt them at runtime. SOPS supports a variety of key management systems, including AWS KMS, GCP KMS, Azure Key Vault, and PGP. It's particularly useful in a DevOps context where sensitive data like API keys, passwords, or certificates need to be securely managed and seamlessly integrated into application workflows.

Encrypted secrets thanks to SOPS and Age

We do the exact same thing to keep track of some credentials we use sops[1] and AWS KMS to separate credentials by sensitivity, then use the git differ to view the diffs between the encrypted secrets

Definitely not best practice security-wise, but it works well

[1] https://github.com/getsops/sops

For anyone new to SOPS like I was - https://github.com/getsops/sops

I've found this is largely solved by strictly separating plain config and secrets, and then having secrets pull from GCP secret manager / vault / whatever.

You can then commit all the config (including the secret identifiers) and it all just works so long as you're authenticated with your secret storage system.

We do this for the live configuration as well in line with Gitops and find it to work well.

If you don't want to use a cloud secret manager you can also use something like https://github.com/getsops/sops to commit the encrypted secrets safely

Basically, the simpler the better --just encrypt your secrets and check them in to version control.

We use SOPS[0] for this, and have found it to be pretty nice.

[0]: https://github.com/getsops/sops

The answer is that secrets shouldn't be stored in the git repo at all, but somewhere safe like a password manager or Mozilla's SOPS which people seem to love.

Unfortunately, the SOPS project is in some sort of a limbo state and there has been quite a long period with limited maintenance and unclear position from Mozilla. Despite the project being accepted into the CNCF, it's still unclear what will happen with it going forward.

It looks like the software you're intending to use is oriented towards interacting with desktop Linux's keyring. While you can probably get this to work, I would recommend using something like sops as it's a more standardized way of storing secrets in configuration.