community VS gatekeeper

Multiple container runtimes are supported, like conatinerd, cri-o, or other CRI compliant runtimes.

More recently, the Kubernetes SIG Network has been evolving the Gateway API to support service meshes.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/calendar/ https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/governance.md https://github.com/kubernetes/steering https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-list.md

According to this doc it takes the average of CPU utilization of a pod (average across the last 1 minute) divided by the CPU requested by the pod. Then it computes the arithmetic mean of all the pods' CPU.

metrics-server has not supported kubectl top Resource Metrics API

With the Gateway API being a superset of the Ingress API, it might make sense to consolidate both. Thanks to the SIG Network community, Gateway API is still growing and will soon be production ready.

Projects in/around Kubernetes and the CNCF are generally where I spend what little time I can these days. Most communities are incredibly welcoming and provide timely feedback. But the problem space of "managing a cloud platform" can take several years to really wrap ones head around, setting aside focused topics via SIGs like networking, storage, observability, API design, etc.

Krew is a plugin manager maintained by the Kubernetes Special Interest Group (SIG) CLI community. Krew makes it easy to use kubectl plugins and helps you discover, install, and manage them on your machine. It is similar to tools like apt, dnf, or brew. Today, over 200 kubectl plugins are available on Krew - and that number is only increasing. Some projects are actively used and some get deprecated over time, but are still accessible via Krew.

[1] https://k8s.devstats.cncf.io/d/9/companies-table?orgId=1&var-period_name=Last%20decade&var-metric=contributions [2] https://kubernetes.io/releases/release/ [3] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/governance.md [4] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-list.md

When the Gatekeeper validatingwebhook came up, I was really worried that'd be the issue! Regardless I'd recommend anyone who cares about their cluster not collapsing to change the gatekeeper webhook to only intercept resources you care about: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/gatekeeper/pull/1806

Kyverno adds an extra layer of security where only the allowed type of manifest is deployed onto kubernetes, otherwise, it will reject or we can set validationFailureAction to audit which only logs the policy violation message for reporting. Kubewarden and Gatekeeper are alternative tools available to enforce policies on Kubernetes CRD.

Now, we have the hardest part resolved and let's turn our attention to the OPA Gatekeeper. Gatekeeper uses the OPA Constraint Framework to describe and enforce policy. Right now there are mainly 3 parts we should pay attention:

They enable you to establish the policies and regulations that govern cluster deployments and applications. Using predefined policies, policy engines can dynamically modify or create configurations. Policy engines such as Gatekeeper and Kyverno can be leveraged to meet legal and compliance requirements while maintaining operational flexibility and development speed.

Setup policy around what resource requirements can be requested by an app per environment. OPA and gatekeeper or kyverno can help. Setup access control for who can create or modify apps.

OPA Gatekeeper is an open source, general purpose policy engine. OPA decouples policy decisions from other responsibilities of an application, like those commonly referred to as business logic. OPA works equally well making decisions for Kubernetes, Microservices, functional application authorization and more, thanks to its single unified policy language.