colorama VS Python Fire

Try using https://github.com/tartley/colorama, that should straighten out most low level problems. If you still have issues, you need to adjust your color scheme in pycharm.

Pyshark: https://github.com/KimiNewt/pyshark Requests: https://github.com/psf/requests Colorama:https://github.com/tartley/colorama

from colorama import Fore, Style # Colorama doesn't support Underlined text because it # is struggling to make it work for windows users # https://github.com/tartley/colorama/issues/38 print(Fore.RED + Style.BRIGHT + 'Danger' + Style.NORMAL)

There are obviously a lot of libraries in python that color text, but I never loved their syntaxes, so I ended up creating this one a few years back. For comparison, this is how you print a red, bold, underlined string in **terminology**\: from terminology import in_red print(in_red('Danger').in_bold().underlined()) and this is how you do it with the other alternatives: **colorama** from colorama import Fore, Style # Colorama doesn't support Underlined text because it # is struggling to make it work for windows users # https://github.com/tartley/colorama/issues/38 print(Fore.RED + Style.BRIGHT + 'Danger' + Style.NORMAL)

The link to its github repository is this: colorama.

Escape sequences may vary depending on the terminal you use. You can try some package like Colorama which escapes those sequences and gives you the correct color in Windows. There is also Blessings.

As I mentioned earlier, Hype doesn't rely on any third-party library but then there are some plugins that third-party library powered Hype. For example, the color printing that is powered by colorama.

Looks really cool! Way more functionality than I'd ever need. I've been using colorama for color coding info, warning, and error messages in my Python projects. No complaints. From the feature list of rich it sounds like it probably pulls in a lot more dependencies?

The cli tool [fire](https://github.com/google/python-fire/blob/master/docs/guide...) has a nifty feature where it can generate a cli for any file for you.

So random and math are somewhat usable that way

    $ python -m fire random uniform 0 1

With python-fire you can use either function or class to create your subcommands. But I find working with classes more intuitive and manageable. Our first command is going to be a sub-command that shows us the UTC time.

Have you checked out fire? Personally, I think it's a really elegant solution to turning a callable object into command line. Plus, the chaining function calls feature lets you build some pretty complex command line patterns likes you never seen with other frameworks. Definitely worth giving it a try!

I started with click but found python fire to be so much easier to use.

I highly recommend checking out fire for adding a CLI quickly to little utility scripts that aren't going to be published to the world but just for you.

python fire autogenerates CLI wrappers for python modules, which really synergizes with method-chaining APIs like pandas.

Fire can basically do the first step (object -> CLI):

https://github.com/google/python-fire

Gooey can do (CLI -> GUI):

https://github.com/chriskiehl/Gooey

also, while we're on the subject, fire may not be the same kind of workhorse as argparse or click, but for really simple stuff it's pretty awesome

I'm relatively new to Go (coming from Python) so I haven't been using Cobra (or Go, for that matter) for long but it's clearly very polished -- only friction I was experiencing with it is there's a lot of boilerplate to creating commands and subcommands, that IMO (idea as proven by python-fire) can be naturally (better) expressed as types / fields / methods that are already built into the language.