cocotb
SpinalHDL
Our great sponsors
cocotb | SpinalHDL | |
---|---|---|
28 | 8 | |
1,599 | 1,518 | |
4.1% | 3.2% | |
9.7 | 9.8 | |
3 days ago | 1 day ago | |
Python | Scala | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cocotb
-
Designing a Low Latency 10G Ethernet Core
The use of cocotb and pyuvm for verification
-
How is Python used in test automation in embedded systems?
For FPGA/HDL work, there's cocotb
-
Introducing CoHDL
At the moment, it is not possible to directly simulate synthesizable contexts. In principle, I could add a simulator to CoHDL. As a Python implementation, it would be orders of magnitude slower than other solutions. Instead, I am using Cocotb to validate the generated VHDL and for the unit tests in the GitHub repository. There is also some very, very experimental support for formal verification, but it will take some time for that to become usable.
- Use cocotb to test and verify chip designs in Python
-
Trying to learn and work with FPGAs
On the topic of simulation, you don't have to restrict yourself to using Verilog or VHDL to write your test benches. For example, Verilator lets you write them in C++, cocotb lets you use Python, and if you use SpinalHDL you will drive the underlying simulator using Scala.
-
Help understanding how this makefile works?
I know it might be difficult without much context, but this makefile is called by a top level makefile. very confused if lines 35-74 do anything. They seem to be a mix of real makefile syntax and just straight up comments. what do these lines do?
-
COBS protocol decoder progress
Learn more about this here: https://www.cocotb.org/
-
AXI-Stream meme
Also consider cocotb, this thread has some compelling arguments. I'd say as a student, learning industry tools isn't necessarily the best thing you could spend your time on. Getting fast at design AND verification, where you can maintain flow state and run better microexperiments means you will understand more, faster.
-
cocotb
Have you tried looking at the mixed language example?
- We're trying to sort this out with some of our engineers, so please humor - Do you prefer VHDL or Verilog?
SpinalHDL
-
1800-2023 – IEEE Standard for SystemVerilog
I'd love to see textual preprocessors kinda banned. Or at least done upstream and outside of the language. You can't both be and also have a textual preprocessor defined internally. It doesn't work.
I really like what Zig and C++ are doing with `const`.
https://ikrima.dev/dev-notes/zig/zig-metaprogramming/
Have you looked at Spinal?
https://github.com/SpinalHDL/SpinalHDL
https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/master/index.html
-
Ao486_MiSTer: i486 core for the MiSTer FPGA gaming system
Many companies do just write entire modern SoCs in straight Verilog (maybe with some autogenerated Verilog hacked in there) with no other major organization tools aside from the typical project management stuff. The load-store unit of a modern CPU alone easily exceeds 10k lines of Verilog. It's a similar thing as people who work with kernels—after all, the page table management code in a modern operating system like Linux is absolutely monstrous but still people are able to understand it well enough to be able to make the changes they need and get out.
If you are interested in other languages which hope to make this sort of stuff easier, I'd recommend taking a look at design productivity languages like Chisel and it's associated Chipyard [1], SpinalHDL [2], and Bluespec [3]. Each of these are meant to make defining extremely complex hardware more manageable for humans and there's a lot of interesting work going on right now with each of them.
[1] https://github.com/ucb-bar/chipyard
[2] https://github.com/SpinalHDL/SpinalHDL
[3] https://github.com/B-Lang-org/bsc
-
Simple skid buffer implementation
I have just found that SpinalHDL also implemented two halves of the fully registered buffer in Stream.scala.
-
Why are there only 3 languages for FPGA development?
Don’t forget SpinalHDL that was forked off of Chisel 2 I believe. These DSLs really leveraged the software features of Scala to help build generalised/modular systems. And are generally a quality of life improvement in the language features available.
- SpinalHDL – A high level hardware description language based on Scala
-
Share some github FPGA projects (bonus if they include C++, Python, or other files)
A lot of reuse from other FOSH projects, including Litex, SpinalHDL, betrusted & u/alexforencich verilog-wishbone. Thanks to all of them :-)
-
Suggest advance project ideas
You could try to implement a PCIe root complex for FOSS SoCs, connecting to e.g. Wishbone as the main bus. There's already some DDR3 controller (or this one) and USB Host controller out there, and even device-side PCIe, but no FOSS host-side PCIe that I know of. Probably quite a difficult job though, even sticking to the lower-speed PCIe 1.
- Chisel/Firrtl Hardware Compiler Framework
What are some alternatives?
cocotbext-axi - AXI interface modules for Cocotb
chisel - Chisel: A Modern Hardware Design Language
cocotb-test - Unit testing for cocotb
amaranth - A modern hardware definition language and toolchain based on Python
litex - Build your hardware, easily!
chiselverify - A dynamic verification library for Chisel.
teroshdl-documenter-demo - This is an example of how TerosHDL can generate your documentation project from the command line. So you can integrate it in your CI workflow.
litepcie - Small footprint and configurable PCIe core
circt - Circuit IR Compilers and Tools