circle VS meta

The real Typescript for C++ is Circle.

https://www.circle-lang.org/

Just like Typescript to JavaScript, the syntax is an evolution of what already exists, not a completely different syntax.

Sean Baxter's Circle [1] is arguably the spiritual successor to MOP.

[1] https://www.circle-lang.org/

Context: https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...

Note that Circle is not an F/OSS compiler as someone pointed out before. This however doesn't make Circle less relevant, because it is actually a testament to show that C++ could have been much better without the claimed breakage. If Circle does provide a number of desirable features and its compiler can be built by a single person, then why shouldn't the committee do the same?

From all wannabe C++ replacements candidates, the only language that is really a TypeScript for C++, is Circle.

For whatever reason, Herb Sutter decided to ignore this language on the presentation.

https://www.circle-lang.org/

This is the only one with the syntax based on C++, incrementally changing the features via #pragma settings.

"Circle Fixes Defects, Makes C++ Language Safer & More Productive"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7fxeNqSK2k

"Circle Evolves C++"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ZDOGDMNLM

The second someone makes a successor language that seamlessly/directly interops with C++ _AND_ has the level of build/IDE tooling that C++/Rust have, I'm on board.

The closest thing right now is Sean Baxter's "Circle" compiler in "Carbon" mode IMO:

https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...

Unfortunately, Circle is closed-source and there's no LSP or other tooling to make the authoring experience nice.

I read through the whole of https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/README.md and man, I'm drooling. Awesome work, kudos.

Have a look at Circle from Sean Baxter [0]. It's pretty impressive.

[0]: https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...

I guess I'm confused which compiler to use. Is this by lock3 the "demo" implementation which is superseded by clang 15.0-reflection (godbolt says that's the compiler used). I'm using clang for now

Is it related to the "meta" branch or a completely independent work ? (https://github.com/lock3/meta/wiki)

then there's no pure C++ solution, you either have to use alternative compilers such as https://github.com/lock3/meta/wiki or Circle, or use an external reflection system such as Qt's moc

https://github.com/lock3/meta/wiki/Metaprogramming-Introductory-Tutorial for a fork of clang with the reflection & metaclass feature

open issue for attribute reflection: https://github.com/lock3/meta/issues/215

and https://github.com/lock3/meta/wiki/Reflection-Introductory-Tutorial for a tutorial

yup, that would be the "CPPX" compiler developed for prototyping reflection and metaprogramming features, also available here