chain-ops-python VS Coconut

You don't need pandas to do chaining. It's a one-liner in pure python: https://github.com/tpapastylianou/chain-ops-python

Not to mention, it's a lot more debuggable this way (which is generally the biggest downside to most specialised chaining approaches).

This is great. I will use it with my python chaining approach: https://github.com/tpapastylianou/chain-ops-python

My only grief is that decorator, which forces you to wrap existing functions anyway (same way I had to define lambdas in my example anyway).

Do you have any insight on that?

> to be part of the Python ecosystem

I'd rather use Python if I'm in the Python ecosystem. So many attempts were made in the past to make a new language compatible with the Python ecosystem (look up hylang and coconu -- https://github.com/evhub/coconut). But at the end of the day, I'd come back to Python because if there's one thing I've learnt in recent years it's this:

    minimize dependencies at all costs.

Have you had a look at Coconut? I don't know if it'll push all your buttons but whenever I hear someone who's reasonably content with Python but wants more FP goodies I always think of it. https://github.com/evhub/coconut . It's basically a superset of Python3 that transpiles into Python3 and is compatible with MyPy. I don't think I'd code Python w/o it ever again assuming I had the choice. The biggest negative for me is that there's no IDE support for the language last I looked, though of course you can work with the transpiler output (plain Python) in your favorite Python IDE. It might be fun to play around with, I know that I really enjoyed it but then I got spoiled by the language+tooling of Scala3, but if you don't have that option ...

If you're looking for suggestions I want to put forward zig lang if you like C/C++ and Coconut Lang if you like Python!

F# and also the fun, compile-to-Python, functional language called Coconut.