carbon-lang
circle
Our great sponsors
| carbon-lang | circle | |
|---|---|---|
| 174 | 54 | |
| 32,188 | 2,165 | |
| 0.5% | - | |
| 9.8 | 5.0 | |
| about 19 hours ago | 6 months ago | |
| C++ | C++ | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
carbon-lang
- Carbon Copy Newsletter No.2
-
Cpp2 and cppfront – An experimental 'C++ syntax 2' and its first compiler
The roadmap for Carbon [0] mentions wanting to have basic, non-trivial programs written in Carbon by the end of 2024. They're aiming for a v0.1 release in 2025. If it gains traction, they're aiming for a v1.0 beyond 2027.
I don't think anyone outside Google will seriously adopt this before it reaches v1.0. Even within Google, they may choose other options.
[0] - https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
- Carbon Language Newsletter, the Carbon Copy, February 2024
-
Odin Programming Language
Carbon was started by Chandler Carruth, at Google, but they wanted to move it to broader governance quickly. It's not under the Google GitHub today, but its own org.
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
-
C++ Should Be C++
What do you think about Carbon[1]? I am hopeful.
[1] https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang
- The NSA advises move to memory-safe languages
- Carbon Language: An experimental successor to C++
-
Toward a TypeScript for C++"
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
next year 0.1 will be usable, 1.0 is about 3 years away, sigh, back to my rust fight
-
Programming Languages Every Developer Should Watch Out For
1. Carbon
circle
-
How difficult would it be to make a c++ compiler
Sean Baxter created a front end c++ compiler by himself, using llvm for the back end and the gcc or clang stl. I think it took him a couple of years. https://www.circle-lang.org/. Before this happened I heard a couple of different people claiming that there would never be a totally new compiler as it was too much work.
-
Toward a TypeScript for C++"
The real Typescript for C++ is Circle.
https://www.circle-lang.org/
Just like Typescript to JavaScript, the syntax is an evolution of what already exists, not a completely different syntax.
-
A Metaobject Protocol for C++ [pdf]
Sean Baxter's Circle [1] is arguably the spiritual successor to MOP.
[1] https://www.circle-lang.org/
-
Circle Evolves C++ [video]
Context: https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...
Note that Circle is not an F/OSS compiler as someone pointed out before. This however doesn't make Circle less relevant, because it is actually a testament to show that C++ could have been much better without the claimed breakage. If Circle does provide a number of desirable features and its compiler can be built by a single person, then why shouldn't the committee do the same?
-
My (Herb Sutter's) C++ Now 2023 talk is online: “A TypeScript for C++”
From all wannabe C++ replacements candidates, the only language that is really a TypeScript for C++, is Circle.
For whatever reason, Herb Sutter decided to ignore this language on the presentation.
https://www.circle-lang.org/
This is the only one with the syntax based on C++, incrementally changing the features via #pragma settings.
"Circle Fixes Defects, Makes C++ Language Safer & More Productive"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7fxeNqSK2k
"Circle Evolves C++"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ZDOGDMNLM
- File for Divorce from LLVM
-
Making C++ Safe Without Borrow Checking, Reference Counting, or Tracing GC
The second someone makes a successor language that seamlessly/directly interops with C++ _AND_ has the level of build/IDE tooling that C++/Rust have, I'm on board.
The closest thing right now is Sean Baxter's "Circle" compiler in "Carbon" mode IMO:
https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...
Unfortunately, Circle is closed-source and there's no LSP or other tooling to make the authoring experience nice.
- Circle-lang: A feasible, simple, and immediate way for C++ to break out of the rut it's been in. Surprised more people aren't talking about it.
-
Recurrence-expression is a programmable superset of fold-expression
I read through the whole of https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/README.md and man, I'm drooling. Awesome work, kudos.
-
Dropping support for old C++ standards
Have a look at Circle from Sean Baxter [0]. It's pretty impressive.
[0]: https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...
What are some alternatives?
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
raspberry-pi-os - Learning operating system development using Linux kernel and Raspberry Pi
crubit
dts2hx - Converts TypeScript definition files (d.ts) to haxe externs (.hx) via the TypeScript compiler API
cppfront - A personal experimental C++ Syntax 2 -> Syntax 1 compiler
mdspan - Reference implementation of mdspan targeting C++23
Odin - Odin Programming Language
papers - ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 paper scheduling and management
go - The Go programming language
CppCoreGuidelines - The C++ Core Guidelines are a set of tried-and-true guidelines, rules, and best practices about coding in C++
hylo - The Hylo programming language
meta