ZeroNet VS zeronet-conservancy

Is there a reason I should use your fork over ZeroNetX? https://github.com/canewsin/ZeroNet

ZeroNetX - by @pramukesh/@canewsin (github), https://github.com/canewsin/ZeroNet, https://zeronet.dev Second fork, i've no idea why it happened (possibly absence of @geekless? i wasn't around and didn't follow how events developed, but they were still around the internets around that time (and then i couldn't contact them any longer))

Isn’t Zeronet abandoned already? It’s decentralised network, but it probably has got a ton of security vulnerabilities because of the dependencies. It should be really running only in VM, and behind Whonix unless you want to accidentally leak the IP through some vuln.

There are forks of it, but I don’t know how trustworthy they are. It’s probably the most popular.

https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy

a new minor version of zeronet-conservancy is released

today /r/riza committee is happy to announce another minor version of zeronet-conservancy, the most actively developed fork of ZeroNet that cares about your security and privacy. in v0.7.8 changelog:

you may want to consult with https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy/issues to see existing issues and maybe pick something from there

0net is p2p decentralised web alternative ;) i'm currently maintaining one of the implementations (forks) , but originally i literally came there to post my music 'cause i didn't want to deal with hosting my music on one of the imperfect third-party sites

type/copypaste git clone https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy.git into command line

that could be returned as long as it's made secure (see #62 and #100

another minor release in preparation for a major beta some time later this month