ca-archive VS web-bugs

»

https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive

A lot of people care a lot. 15,000 developers falsifies your ludicrous "no one in the world cares about.

Like many others, you are mixing up "I don't care" with "nobody cares", and you are wrong.

No, it's impossible. PM doesn't support Web Extensions. You can look at the more than 200 extensions on the PM addons site, or legacy XUL addons on CAA (maybe even an older version of the one you mentioned).

You will not be able to use addons from addons.mozilla because they use google Web Extensions and not the more powerful XUL addons they started with. There are many addons available for Pale Moon though https://addons.palemoon.org/extensions/ (even older firefox ones: https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive)

Because they're more powerful, meaning you can change and customize more things. That doesn't translate to basic, so you're way off there. It's also not only Pale Moon's own https://addons.palemoon.org/extensions/ but they include https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive as well (all firefox addons before they became extensions).

Not without an extension, you can install the Classic Addons Archive and look for one there.

Install CAA and search for Priv8 on it, and look at NoSquint.

7) I don't really use translation add-ons so don't think I could be of help you with this, sorry. There's an add-on listed on the official add-ons site called BabbleOn, but I think that only just redirects websites to their Google Translated version. Note though that if you can't find an add-on that suit your needs, there's always the option of using the Classic Add-ons Archive to search for the add-on that does. Anyway, I'd like to address the following:

The thread is very long, here is the relevant comment:

https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/131916#issuecom...

https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%...

Microsoft Teams (which I don't think many people use voluntarily) in particular breaks in stupid ways - and then in others if you spoof your user agent.

a link to the video would help with troubleshooting, seems like another case of "this site or this particular feature doesn't support firefox" otherwise report to https://webcompat.com/

Have any of you faced this? If the website is made to open only in chromium-based browsers, I am planning to report to Webcompat. But before that, I thought I would make sure from others. Any experience or quick fix would be appreciated.

Teams was a classic hellhole for me when I was using Linux. Nowadays it lets you in but Firefox genuinely doesn't support all of the features the Teams site uses. This means certain features are made unavailable to Firefox users. Forcing the user agent makes some of these partially work but they are also still broken so Mozilla doesn't want to enable a user agent override by default and Microsoft doesn't want to enable a feature that only half works.

This GitHub WebCompat issue serves as a good example history https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/77892

https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues/125920#issuecom...

having recently looked at a firefox performance regression for filing a bugreport, tooling that tracks performance (quite publicly) sees attention, easy upload to share tracing profiles also helps: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/testing/perfdocs/ind...

Their dedicated blog keeps you posted if firefox perf is your interest https://blog.mozilla.org/performance/

If you have a particular website you notice chromium being significantly faster with, for an easy report, there's https://webcompat.com/ - though bugzilla is better than it seems when coming from github issues