bull VS fastify

To implement the solution with a queue, I used a package called 'Bull' (https://github.com/OptimalBits/bull). It's a library that helps with distributed job control, providing some very useful solutions for this type of work, such as background job processing, queues with priorities (FIFO, LIFO, and others), among other features. 'Bull' uses Redis for queue storage, so if your application crashes for any reason, once it's back online, it will continue executing the processes that are in the queue. In our case, we'll use the FIFO (First in, first out) queue solution, meaning priority based on arrival order.

We use bull-js for our distributed queue and event-driven library.

I'm using the excellent Redis based Bull.js as a job queue on Kubernetes.

For Job Queue, NestJs provides a package named @nestjs/bull as an abstraction/wrapper on top of Bull, a popular, well-supported, high-performance Node. js-based Queue system implementation.

I'm working on a large ETL project that involves handling queues for file integration. Currently, we are using Redis with Bull (https://www.npmjs.com/package/bull) for this purpose. However, to streamline our architecture and address security concerns, we are considering migrating the queue to PostgreSQL.

BullMQ is a pretty solid choice: https://github.com/taskforcesh/bullmq It's the successor of Bull: https://github.com/OptimalBits/bull

For Node specifically, things like Streams, understanding the asynchronous model completely, and the event loop. Also, queues tend to get used a lot in Node, so understanding the basic concepts behind that and how to use something like bull would be useful.

To do this properly, you need to put the task into queue, so if there are 1000 simultaneous uploads it won't kill your server but will be processed one by one. For the queue, see bull. Image hostings like AWS have some functionality for processing on their side, as an option.

This is a memory intensive process though and Heroku is OOM'ing with R14 errors. For this they recommend migrating intensive work like this to a Background Job via Redis, implemented in Bull and Throng

For example, Fastify removed the instanceof operatorfrom its codebase because it was causing problems for those developers that rely on jest as a testing framework.

Both are frameworks but NextJs is for Forntend (web app in browser that use ReactJs under the hood) and NestJs is for Backend (server app running on a server witch use Express or Fastify). The only thing similar between them is the typed language in which they were written.

Restify & Fastify Hapi

Let's create a sample Node API project we can work with throughout to build a new docker image. We will leverage Fastify to create an API that we configure via the fastify-cli.

Fastify

In setting out to build this service, we wanted to use gRPC for its APIs. We’ve been reaching for REST when building APIs so far, primarily out of necessity, i.e., our public APIs needed auto-generated client SDKs and docs for developers working with them. We built those APIs with Fastify and Typebox but felt burned by a code-first approach to generating an OpenAPI spec. I’ll spare you the details and save that experience/learning for another article. Suffice it to say we love gRPC’s schema-first approach. This blog post summarizes our feelings well

Fastify – Fast and Low overhead web framework

Custom Functions are powered by Fastify (a light-weight Node.js framework that claims to be faster than Express.js), so they’re extremely flexible.