bud VS tetra

Compare bud vs tetra and see what are their differences.

bud

The Full-Stack Web Framework for Go (by livebud)

tetra

Tetra - A full stack component framework for Django using Alpine.js (by samwillis)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
bud tetra
34 17
5,493 513
1.6% -
4.3 0.0
4 months ago about 1 year ago
JavaScript Python
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

bud

Posts with mentions or reviews of bud. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-06.

tetra

Posts with mentions or reviews of tetra. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-29.
  • Coming to grips with JS: a Rubyist's deep dive
    16 projects | dev.to | 29 Dec 2023
    Then there are stack-specific libraries: StimulusReflex for Rails, Phoenix LiveView, Laravel Livewire, Unicorn and Tetra for Django, Blazor for .NET, … and the list goes on.
  • Unicorn – A full-stack web framework for Django
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Aug 2023
    Unicorn is awesome, and I think most would agree that it's the Django communities answer to Livewire/Liveview/etc. Adam has built a brilliant project and the time he must dedicate to it is amazing!

    Last year I had a month free and I had a go at building something for Django in this area, with a bunch of interesting ideas - built on Alpine.js, resumable server side component state, inline component templates. But sadly time is limited and I just can't spend the time needed to push it further. One day I may be able to pivot back to it: https://www.tetraframework.com/

  • Django 4.2 Released
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2023
    There's a brilliant project called Django Unicorn that aims to be the equivalent of Laravel Livewire for Django. You should take a look.

    https://www.django-unicorn.com/

    That and HTMX + Alpine.js are a strong combination.

    (I also had a bash at building a similar tool for Django called Tetra but unfortunately haven't had the time needed to commit to it: https://www.tetraframework.com)

  • Build a full-stack app with Tetra
    6 projects | dev.to | 18 Aug 2022
    Most full-stack applications separate frontend and backend code into distinct files; most web frameworks are built based on this structure. As the number of files and lines of code increases, it may increase the complexity of your codebase, thereby making it even more difficult to debug. The complexity caused by these separate files was minimized through the introduction of a framework called Tetra.
  • An SPA Alternative
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Jul 2022
    One of my apps built on the Django+HTMX stack got traction and no matter how much I loved using HTMX, I found it’s not feasible to keep a clean codebase (facilitating new developers on the team as well) with this stack.

    [Tetra](https://www.tetraframework.com/) might be an alternative if you’re hell-bent on not using React.

    But, if you want to ship quick, have a maintainable codebase in a technology a lot of devs are familiar with and have the power to instantly have an app for mobile (and buy yourself some time to build one in React Native; code is going to be similar to React.js), I’d recommend using React.

    You can use Capacitor.js for instantly shipping a mobile app with your codebase that “just works”. Use Capgo for affordable codepush and you’re set!

    But then again, HTMX all the way if you’re not building an app cause not everything is an “app”. At the same time, if you’re building an app with a framework unlike Phoenix, I don’t see why would not go ahead and use a decent JS framework. It seems to be getting a lot of hate and I don’t understand if it’s because of the inability to learn React or what.

  • The next big python module: Which libraries are you missing?
    3 projects | /r/Python | 16 Jul 2022
  • Is there a Turbo Links or Livewire alternative for Django?
    5 projects | /r/django | 12 Jun 2022
    tetra
  • Golang Web Framework that works hand in hand with Alpine.js
    6 projects | /r/golang | 12 Jun 2022
    Recently I found a web framework the sits on top of Django and is specifically designed to work with Alpine.js (tetraframework.com). What makes it stand out is that HTMX or Hotwire isn't needed, as Tetra takes care of it. (discussion on ycombinator)
  • This week in Python
    5 projects | dev.to | 27 May 2022
    tetra – A full stack component framework for Django using Alpine.js – by @samwillis
  • Today’s JavaScript, from an outsider’s perspective (2020)
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 May 2022
    JS tooling has come a long way in the last couple of years, Vite for example is so much better than everything that came before. Esbuild is incredible and clearly the future of all JS build tools.

    The trouble is that to people who are only just outside JS ecosystem it’s not very accessible. If you are a PHP, Python or Ruby developer who cut your teeth in the era of jQuery or earlier it can be quite difficult to make the transition.

    Combining the modern JS environments with platforms like Django, Laravel or Rails often means having to install and setup from scratch a full Node/NPM toolchain in parallel with your backend toolchain. I believe this is some of the reason for such a disconnect between the the “backend” and “frontend” unless you go 100% JS. I think it's pushed a lot of devs who used to think of themselves as "full stack" towards the backend.

    I’m trying to fix this with Tetra (https://www.tetraframework.com) for the Django ecosystem, the plan is to eventually bundle a esbuild/postcss/sass/less toolchain along with built in tools for installing JS dependancies so you can completely live within the Python/Django environment. It will manage all the complexities of JS tooling for you.

    The vast majority of developers don't want to think about tooling, they just want to build something quickly and get it out there.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bud and tetra you can also consider the following projects:

Buffalo - Rapid Web Development w/ Go

quickjs - Public repository of the QuickJS Javascript Engine.

v8go - Execute JavaScript from Go

gomarvin - Generate Go REST servers with custom endpoints & typescript fetch clients

sqlc - Generate type-safe code from SQL

live - Live views and components for golang

cheerio - The fast, flexible, and elegant library for parsing and manipulating HTML and XML.

xo - Command line tool to generate idiomatic Go code for SQL databases supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server

gomodest-template - A template to build dynamic web apps quickly using Go, html/template and javascript

copper - 🚀‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎‏‏‎‎‎‎‎‎Copper is a Go toolkit complete with everything you need to build web apps.

htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML

goja - ECMAScript/JavaScript engine in pure Go