brook VS pritunl-client-electron

Programming is very flexible, more can be found in documentation and other articles of this blog

编程非常灵活，更多可以查看文档和本博客的其他文章

We know that brook relay can relay any service based on TCP and UDP, just need to specify a from address and a to address. But according to the seventh step of the previous Socks 5 proxy UDP protocol, it is only necessary for the Socks 5 Server to specify the UDP Server that informs the client as the address of the relay server. If you are using brook socks5, you can use the --socks5ServerIP parameter to specify the IP of the UDP Server.

- [GUI] If the server information is added through brook link, the details will not be displayed

https://github.com/txthinking/brook/releases/tag/v20210701

Trojan-Go (paired with a CDN) or Brook are designed for use cases like yours.

Github: https://github.com/txthinking/brook Document: https://txthinking.github.io/brook/

The only one I've found so far is https://client.pritunl.com/ so I will try that later today to see if it works with our server version and doesn't need admin rights to connect. But are there any other suggestions for third party clients?

https://github.com/autotune/pritunl-k8s-tf-do/blob/master/README.md is the repo. The README should answer any questions about how the pipeline works but the end result is a pritunl webgui listening on port 80 with an ingress route for https, a SERVICE load balancer that listens for VPN connections, and the ability to connect to said service load balancer over Pritunl VPN client. Note this is missing a few things, for one you can only have a replica set of 1 in the deployment. I need to figure out how to add HA with the "enterprise" edition at $70/month extra (still relatively cheap for what you get!). But for personal use it should suffice. Also, I tried using an ingress for the vpn itself but can't get it working, so stuck with SVC load balaner instead, which works fine. Any suggestions here would be appreciated!