bromite
brave-browser

bromite | brave-browser | |
---|---|---|
496 | 1,391 | |
5,995 | 19,676 | |
0.0% | 1.2% | |
0.0 | 9.9 | |
over 1 year ago | about 11 hours ago | |
JavaScript | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
bromite
-
The confusing CalyxOS-supplied Chromium
Our goal with the Chromium provided in CalyxOS has been to provide a browser with a solid base of privacy and security enhancements vs Chromium (and by extension, vs Chrome) while still allowing most sites and WebView-based apps to function as expected out of the box. We do this by using select changes from Cromite (and prior to that, Bromite). Some of these include the under-the-hood deactivation of intrusive features and analytics, while others provide additional site settings to adjust features like WebGL and WebRTC, features which are sometimes necessary but which can aid in fingerprinting or identification when turned on. We also bring in the legacy ad blocker from Bromite/Cromite to offer some reasonable protection from the worst kinds of ads. You can find and adjust these features in Settings.
-
Top 10 Android Apps in 2013 (not available on the Google Play Store)
https://github.com/bromite/bromite Browser (based on Chrome)
-
Nexus 7 Flox: flo-deb_clamor_repartition_20201203.zip unavailable
Normally, I'd recommend Bromite as a lightweight Chromium-based browser with built-in adblocking, but the project appears to be asleep right now. It might be worth checking it in a few weeks, though.
- Should I get the Bromite SystemWebView?
-
Alternative to Samsung Internet - Android browser with bottom back & forward buttons (not hidden)
Bromite via either its site/Fdroid, GitHub or Woolyss site has a bottom bar available in accessibility settings. (The first one has been unmaintained for a while, but has auto updates available if they ever drop. The other two are up to date but must be updated manually.)
-
the best browser
Bromite hasn't been updated since December: https://github.com/bromite/bromite/releases
-
Daniel Micay steps down as the leader of GrapheneOS. My thoughts and why you should keep using it.
context: https://github.com/bromite/bromite/issues/2141
- Did Louis Rossman gaslight his audience about grapheneOS's lead developer?
- At what point do you stop caring about your privacy?
- GrapheneOS – Corporate FOSS loving witch hunting crybullies feat. PrivacyGuides and DivestOS
brave-browser
-
Why not use DNS over HTTPS (DoH)?
https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/39028
- Washington Post's Privacy Tip: Stop Using Chrome, Delete Meta Apps (and Yandex)
-
Ask HN: User IDs in app share links
Brave seems to remove these parameters from links. Discussion (and links to examples/docs): https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/35094
-
Useful Sites for Privacy and Security
Brave - Privacy-focused browser with ad-blocking.
- Google Being Forced to Sell Chrome Is Not Good for the Web
-
uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
Separate reply that ritual impurity or blind black-box rejection of open source Chromium/Blink seems also to suffer from emotionalism over reason. See
https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-...
This is a choice we made. As I wrote in my last reply, I think we would have died trying to get Gecko/Graphene with a Web front end up to competitive scratch vs. Chrome (nm Firefox).
A Firefox fork would have gone over badly with some potentially large number of Mozilla/Firefox fans, and we'd still lack key elements not part of the Mozilla open source (at the time, e.g., Adobe's CDM for HTML5 DRM). On the upside we'd have more UX customizability.
But our choice of Chromium/Blink (via Electron, so we had Web front end upside without Firefox extensions) was not a slam dunk choice. It involved trade-offs, as all engineering does. The downside is we have to audit and network-test for leaks and blunders, which often come from Chromium upstream:
https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/1898529583546421322
-
16 Best Open Source Software in 2025: From Text Editing to Media Playback - Ultimate Free Tools Guide🛠🔥🔥
6. Brave
-
Show HN: Plotcode – Infrastructure as Code patterns that you can copy and deploy
[2] https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/10808
-
Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported
At the very least, I do not trust a browser that was putting affiliate links to unsuspecting users' urls [0]. Plus I tbh I am really sick of everything tending to be chromium-derivatives nowadays and I think it is good to have greater diversity, to exactly avoid situation susch as the one here.
https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/10134
-
Lobsters Blocks Brave Browser for Scammy Behavior
Not so. The Chromium bits have the native tracking goo we neutralize, see https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-....
What are some alternatives?
iceraven-browser - Iceraven Browser
bypass-paywalls-chrome - Bypass Paywalls web browser extension for Chrome and Firefox. [UnavailableForLegalReasons - Repository access blocked]
ungoogled-chromium - Google Chromium, sans integration with Google
Vanadium - Privacy and security enhanced releases of Chromium for GrapheneOS. Vanadium provides the WebView and standard user-facing browser on GrapheneOS. It depends on hardening in other GrapheneOS repositories and doesn't include patches not relevant to the build targets used on GrapheneOS.
mulch
thorium - Chromium fork named after radioactive element No. 90. Windows and MacOS/Raspi/Android/Special builds are in different repositories, links are towards the top of the README.md.
