The Blocklist Project VS easylist

Here's a good starting list of TikTok hosts, of which overlaps a few of ByteDance's domains: https://github.com/blocklistproject/Lists/blob/master/tiktok...

For the past few years I've just used the standard StevenBlack one that is enabled by default when you setup PiHole, and it covers the large majority of ads. The only ads I still see are on YouTube and Twitch, and as far as I know those can't be blocked with a DNS sinkhole since the ads are served from the same domain as the content. The lists on that site seem like they let you block a bunch of other stuff, not necessarily ads, but domains related to gambling, crypto, TikTok etc. That's a bit different.

do check out: blocklist project Homepage: https://blocklist.site

get more here at the Blocklist Project, and make sure its NoIp to paste in.

If you go that way these are some great lists that cover porn too

import { ScreenshotOptions } from "./schema"; import puppeteer, { Page } from "puppeteer"; import { PuppeteerBlocker } from "@cliqz/adblocker-puppeteer"; import fetch from "cross-fetch"; let blocker: PuppeteerBlocker | null = null; async function blockCookieBanners(page: Page) { if (!blocker) { blocker = await PuppeteerBlocker.fromLists(fetch, [ // the list of the cookie banners to block from the https://easylist.to/ website "https://secure.fanboy.co.nz/fanboy-cookiemonster.txt", ]); } await blocker.enableBlockingInPage(page); } export async function render( options: ScreenshotOptions ): Promise<{ url: string }> { const browser = await puppeteer.launch(); const page = await browser.newPage(); if (options.block_cookie_canners) { await blockCookieBanners(page); } await page.setViewport({ width: options.viewport_width, height: options.viewport_height, deviceScaleFactor: options.device_scale_factor, }); await page.goto(options.url); const encodedScreenshot = await page.screenshot({ type: "jpeg", encoding: "base64", fullPage: options.full_page, }); await browser.close(); return { url: `data:image/jpeg;base64,${encodedScreenshot}` }; }

uBlock Origin has a few lists for cookie banners that I always keep on [0][1]

[0] https://github.com/easylist/easylist/tree/master/easylist_co...

[1] https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/tree/master/An...

If I have noticed a new ad, to which list should I report a filter issue? Should I report the new advertisement to the issue tracker at uBlockOrigin/uAssets, or should it be reported to EasyList instead?

There's also the easylist version available here: https://easylist.to/

Its a EasyList issue. Got fixed now in the EasyList filterlist https://github.com/easylist/easylist/commit/3ea2c063a2d44a8ed64c1c89ddee14b3a86ec0af

brgm.fr https://github.com/easylist/easylist/commit/1203d9b78a4ee073c0649b253d13d853430010c6

https://github.com/easylist/easylist/issues/16372#issuecomme...

> Stupid example of why it may matter: say you installed LAMP on your computer several years ago, you're not using PHP frequently, and you haven't kept it up to date (so it probably contains a few nasty security vulnerabilities), but it still opens up on boot and listens on localhost.

> Now you open some website, it accesses 127.0.0.1, check for the LAMP vulnerability and exploit it if found.