ble.sh VS powerlevel10k

Compare ble.sh vs powerlevel10k and see what are their differences.

ble.sh

Bash Line Editor―a line editor written in pure Bash with syntax highlighting, auto suggestions, vim modes, etc. for Bash interactive sessions. (by akinomyoga)

powerlevel10k

A Zsh theme (by romkatv)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
ble.sh powerlevel10k
50 291
1,980 42,328
- -
9.1 8.8
18 days ago 10 days ago
Shell Shell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ble.sh

Posts with mentions or reviews of ble.sh. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-25.
  • [Release v0.2.0] promkit: A toolkit for building interactive command-line tools in Rust
    2 projects | /r/commandline | 25 Oct 2023
    So could someone say use this to reimplement blesh in Rust?
  • After years of bash, I actually found a shortcut I never heard about.
    2 projects | /r/linux | 23 May 2023
  • Which Shell?
    3 projects | /r/linuxmint | 4 May 2023
    Bash + ble.sh = fish like interactive features but still bash.
  • Sweet Shell: With Oh-My-Zsh, SpaceVim, Starship, True Color, and Demo Mode
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Nov 2022
    > Autocompletion is one thing zsh does better, and that alone is worth it IMO. It can autocomplete things other than filenames and even gives you a short description for each of the subcommands or CLI options in the completion candidates. For the most common commands, this works without even having to install third party completion scripts.

    The joke here is: All this requires additional scripts / configs. Whether bundled or not…

    With those scripts / config there is no difference between shells.

    > Syntax highlighting is useful as well, though that requires the use of a third party plugin. You can detect quoting errors, unmatched braces, missing commands, incorrect filepaths before hitting enter. It's indispensable in an interactive shell because that's where you write convoluted one-off one-liners.

    https://github.com/akinomyoga/ble.sh

    > In general, zsh is extensible and offers more capabilities than bash.

    Nobody ever could show me even one feature that isn't available in almost all popular shells!

    > But to feel the difference, you need to configure it and enable the nice features.

    Yeah sure. When you tune your ̵c̵a̵r̵ shell it has nice features afterwards…

    That's true for any shell as I see it.

    ---

    I for my part don't like Unix shell. Even after 20 years of usage (as since then Linux is my only OS).

    Also I've never understood what's the case about zsh. Nobody could ever answer the question why it's anyhow "better" or even show features not available elsewhere.

    I came to the conclusion that zsh is just a stupid hype of "cool kids". It's the same as with the car tuning crowd.

    A truly better shell would be much different than a Unix shell. There are some experiments out there but nothing really convincing.

    So I continue to stay with the not so cool default. As it's most compatible and available everywhere.

    But please wake me up when there is some real innovation regarding shells!

    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Nov 2022
    > With those scripts / config there is no difference between shells.

    As I wrote in my original comment, bash only does filepath completion most of the time even with third party completion scripts. And I have never seen bash

    > https://github.com/akinomyoga/ble.sh

    ble.sh is impressive work, but it's a hack that won't be as reliable or compatible without built-in support for programmatic manipulation of the command line buffer in bash. ble.sh diverts key input from readline and reimplements its features. It contains workarounds for specific terminals, and scripts have to be modified to accommodate ble.sh. IIRC FZF's shell integration required modifications to work with ble.sh.

    > Nobody ever could show me even one feature that isn't available in almost all popular shells!

    Read the parts of my original comment which you haven't quoted.

    > When you tune your ̵c̵a̵r̵ shell it has nice features afterwards…

    Only to the extent that the shell lets you.

    > I came to the conclusion that zsh is just a stupid hype of "cool kids". It's the same as with the car tuning crowd.

    That was uncalled for.

  • Does Bash have something like Powershell's MenuComplete?
    4 projects | /r/bash | 24 Oct 2022
  • Fuzzy file completion in bash
    2 projects | /r/bash | 14 Oct 2022
    You might try blesh. It has a nice completion for files and variables in bash
  • Bash 5.2
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Sep 2022
    Nice, there's also ble.sh -- a bash replacement of readline that has zsh/fish-like syntax colors and completion. It is actively developed and the maintainer has implemented 2 features I've requested in a matter of hours.

    If you want to check it out: https://github.com/akinomyoga/ble.sh

    (Still, I personally believe these features are overrated and don't actually bring in more usability or comfort to the command line experience)

  • Is there a way to make Konsole act like it does in Manjaro?
    2 projects | /r/kde | 19 Sep 2022
    Yea, there is also ble.sh. I haven't used them myself because I wrote a simple one of my own to scratch my itch. What do you like the most about oh-my-bash? They don't have the same capabilities as other shells, though.
  • How to get terminal autocomplete like this?
    3 projects | /r/commandline | 16 Sep 2022
    Sadly, no. But if you want to try one of zsh feature is menu complete, you can install ble.sh

powerlevel10k

Posts with mentions or reviews of powerlevel10k. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-09.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ble.sh and powerlevel10k you can also consider the following projects:

starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!

ohmyzsh - 🙃 A delightful community-driven (with 2,200+ contributors) framework for managing your zsh configuration. Includes 300+ optional plugins (rails, git, macOS, hub, docker, homebrew, node, php, python, etc), 140+ themes to spice up your morning, and an auto-update tool so that makes it easy to keep up with the latest updates from the community.

oh-my-posh - The most customisable and low-latency cross platform/shell prompt renderer

bash-it - A community Bash framework.

zsh-autocomplete - 🤖 Real-time type-ahead completion for Zsh. Asynchronous find-as-you-type autocompletion.

fish-shell - The user-friendly command line shell.

nerd-fonts - Iconic font aggregator, collection, & patcher. 3,600+ icons, 50+ patched fonts: Hack, Source Code Pro, more. Glyph collections: Font Awesome, Material Design Icons, Octicons, & more

tide - 🌊 The ultimate Fish prompt.

gruvbox

papirus-icon-theme - Pixel perfect icon theme for Linux

powerline-shell - A beautiful and useful prompt for your shell

spaceship-prompt - :rocket::star: Minimalistic, powerful and extremely customizable Zsh prompt