bitwarden VS rbw

Releases · bitwarden/bitwarden · GitHub

Hey there! If Linked Custom Fields aren't helping here, as suggested below, you can submit details using the browser or mobile auto-fill fail form provided in the Github issue.

Hey There! You can submit an issue on Github or reach out to our support team.

It’s known issue. Unfortunately still not fixed. Github issue

Thanks for confirmation, you can submit a detailed report on Github, or contact our support team here.

Hi there, you can find out more about this issue on Github.

This issue is currently being tracked on Github here. You can also try the following:

You can also report specific browser auto-fill issues.

Yes, but it is quite uncomfortable to use, requiring you to get a session key and storing it somewhere. Instead, I've had good experiences with [rbw]. Maybe that would also be interesting for GP.

I've used to rbw for a rofi (and rofi-like frontend): https://github.com/fdw/rofi-rbw/

[rbw]: https://github.com/doy/rbw/

See https://github.com/doy/rbw for all the details

You can try using rbw to do that.

If you'd like a CLI client (also written in Rust), I'd recommend rbw, it's really simple but works a lot better for me than the official client.

If you know rust and C#, you can also look at bitwarden/server implementation (C#), or dani-garcia/vaultwarden (rust). Lastly, doy/rbw is a fully fledged CLI implementation of a client, and there is always looking at the official client implementation (bitwarden/browser and bitwarden/cli).

However, I've moved from that to rbw and I can honestly say it's much better. It handles locking/unlocking very well, and the interface actually makes sense.

I agree that the Bitwarden cli is awful. You have to log in, and store the token it gives you manually so that it knows you're logged in.

However, I found https://github.com/doy/rbw , and alternative OSS cli written in Rust, and it's exactly what I wanted. (Disclaimer: I liked it so much I wrote a rofi integration for it.)