charts VS traefik-helm-chart

Both of these examples seem pretty obvious and something you wouldn’t mess up, but as your chart grows, so does your values.yaml file. A great example is the Redis chart by Bitnami. I encourage you to scroll through its values file. See you in a minute!

We will write a Terraform module that will take a list of configurations for each required RabbitMQ instance. Luckily for us, we don't have to write the Kubernetes yaml configurations since the helm charts by Bitnami does a great job of doing all the things we discussed above. All we need to do is leverage Terraform Helm Provider and deploy the chart with the required values for our use case.

💡  The full details of helm charts can be referenced in their associated GitHub Repository.

I have a configmap with the ndjson set up under data:, similar to https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/6159 and it's subsequent answer.

This way, you can easily deploy any Helm charts from this public repo - https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/bitnami in just minutes.

The Bitnami Github Pages themselves usually cover everything you need to know. Configure a values.yaml file, or modify that to your liking, and you run helm install, as written in their docs.

The actual reason that our pods are not coming up is found when we review the helm installation that we are trying to run. If you check the dependencies in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/bitnami/charts/blob/main/bitnami/drupal/values.yaml) you find out that persistent storage is enabled by default and set to 8Gi. Also, the helm package uses MariaDB and the database size is specified to a default of 8Gi, thus setting the minimum storage for this installation to be 16Gi.

We're using https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/bitnami/spark, but I have heard good things about https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/spark-on-k8s-operator as well. Hudi should not need any long running deployments as per the docs https://hudi.apache.org/docs/0.5.1/deployment/#deploying

Bitnami has its own scaffolding published at https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/template

helm chart Traefik Ingress

For an example, consider the NGINX Ingress Controller Helm Chart and the Traefik Ingress Controller Helm Chart. Both of these charts install an IngressController but they have their own set of features, configuration, and operation. While they do similar things, they are not the same. Rather than having to pull a bunch of yaml files from a github repo, you can execute a helm install after telling helm where the definition of the charts comes from for a given application. Helm will then go and fetch all the manifests contained in the chart and populate values into the manifest from its defined defaults merged with any values that you specify as an override (or option). If another version of the application comes out, rather than having to update everything, you can just run helm upgrade to update the release to a newer chart version (which may update the internal application code). If the chart version didn't change, but you need a newer release version, a lot of times this is handled by a version variable that you can specify. You just update that (either on the command line or in a values file) and run helm upgrade to change the manifests that get pushed and automatically your deployments will get updated.

Traefik was deployed using Traefik's chart (https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart). Reading the default values.yaml file, I understand that the Prometheus metrics endpoint is enabled by default. I can confirm that I see the metrics when I access the pod on port 9100/metrics/.

You can Just use the Traefik V2 Helm Chart https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart

You can find the CRDs in Traefik's helm chart repo

A thousand times, yes. I've wanted to write this same article. Thanks for saving me the time!

The industry is going to great lengths to avoid writing configuration in any ubiquitous imperative programming language. We're seeing the proliferation of hyper-specialized, clunky declarative languages with sub-par tooling and package ecosystems. In what world are templates acceptable code? I don't mean to pick on anything specific, but this[0] is the most recent example I've come across, and it's far from the most unreadable examples.

[0]: https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart/blob/master/tr...

I have Traefik 2 as my ingress controller acting as the reverse proxy, deployed via Helm. I am using the Bitnami Helm chart to deploy wordpress.

You can then use helm to remove the old traefik deployment and install from wherever you'd prefer. I used the official traefik helm. I made sure that I copied the values from /var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/manifests/traefik.yaml to my values file (retrieved from https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart/blob/master/traefik/values.yaml). Here I also added the helm operator ports.web.redirectTo: websecure (per u/soundwave_rk).

Traefik Helm chart has 402 stars, but the problem here is that 100 people can use it and they don't add stars since they don't log in to GitHub for it. I don't star Debian packages either.

I installed Traefik by helm. You'll need to install helm on the machine you're running kubectl on, then you can follow their instructions at https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart to install.