BigCache VS badger

Compare BigCache vs badger and see what are their differences.

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library
Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
nutrient.io
featured
BigCache badger
1 30
7,686 14,237
0.8% 0.8%
5.3 8.6
28 days ago 3 days ago
Go Go
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

BigCache

Posts with mentions or reviews of BigCache. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-29.
  • Recommendation for Key/Value storage
    9 projects | /r/golang | 29 Dec 2021
    There are also different packages used as a wrapper on top of the Go map based on what your requirements are (storing a lot of data) https://github.com/allegro/bigcache or (need performance) https://github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto. For basic use-cases, the standard Go map should be enough. Just keep in mind whether you need concurrent access to your data structure, in which case you should guard your map with a mutex .

badger

Posts with mentions or reviews of badger. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-16.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BigCache and badger you can also consider the following projects:

go-cache - An in-memory key:value store/cache (similar to Memcached) library for Go, suitable for single-machine applications.

nutsdb - A simple, fast, embeddable, persistent key/value store written in pure Go. It supports fully serializable transactions and many data structures such as list, set, sorted set.

GCache - An in-memory cache library for golang. It supports multiple eviction policies: LRU, LFU, ARC

buntdb - BuntDB is an embeddable, in-memory key/value database for Go with custom indexing and geospatial support

groupcache - groupcache is a caching and cache-filling library, intended as a replacement for memcached in many cases.

fastcache - Fast thread-safe inmemory cache for big number of entries in Go. Minimizes GC overhead

bolt

ristretto - A high performance memory-bound Go cache

goleveldb - LevelDB key/value database in Go.

ledisdb - A high performance NoSQL Database Server powered by Go

Bitcask - 🔑 A high performance Key/Value store written in Go with a predictable read/write performance and high throughput. Uses a Bitcask on-disk layout (LSM+WAL) similar to Riak.

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library
Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
nutrient.io
featured

Did you know that Go is
the 4th most popular programming language
based on number of references?