bash-language-server VS sh

In neovim I would recommend setting shellcheck with null.ls or using the bash language server: https://github.com/bash-lsp/bash-language-server

both work really well

Also maybe check out the bash language server.

https://github.com/bash-lsp/bash-language-server/

In that case, I think Eglot supports this language server: https://github.com/bash-lsp/bash-language-server out of the box but I've never tried it.

There are some language servers that are built using tree-sitter, so it's not impossibly slow. Github was running their syntax highlighting using tree-sitter I believe for the website.

There are also: - shfmt - sh - bash language server - bashate

Shell: bash-language-server required.

- Bash Language Server: https://github.com/bash-lsp/bash-language-server

As well, having a bash language server enabled (https://github.com/bash-lsp/bash-language-server) helps immensely.

* The shell itself is https://github.com/mvdan/sh, a bash-like command interpreter

https://github.com/mvdan/sh

And finally, checkbashisms if you intend on making pure posix scripts that are compatible with debian/ubuntu's dash. It is part of the debian's devscripts suite, but is often individually packaged in other distros.

> Also you can use the chat as a learning tool

Or you could learn from a guide written by people who have suffered decades of experience of the pitfalls of shell scripting and have shared their woes.

https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashGuide

My bad, I completely screwed this up... the as of yet undiscussed project is:

https://github.com/mvdan/sh

(not shmfmt)

I support projects like this for purposes of exploration and practice. But don't expect people to use it when there are already well established projects out there like: https://github.com/mvdan/sh

There are also: - shfmt - sh - bash language server - bashate

I also like running shfmt over my shell scripts so they all look the same without me having to think about whitespace.