awesome-space VS orbiter

NASA needs multiple lander options; putting all their cards on a lunar Starship landing was always a bit ridiculous, even if it seems reasonably likely to happen. So if you want the Artemis program to actually happen, this is likely a good thing. However, with congress in a deadlock around the debt ceiling, and SLS costing $4B per launch, this is only going to add to Artemis's serious funding challenges.

If you're interested in the space industry in general, I'll cover this more next week in the weekly Orbital Index newsletter (https://orbitalindex.com) which I co-author with blach.

You should definitely submit this to https://github.com/orbitalindex/awesome-space#earth!

If you're into this stuff, we write about it in Orbital Index pretty frequently: https://orbitalindex.com

(Some of the paragraph I posted was excerpted from a recent issue.)

OpenMCT is solid. We have a bunch of open source space-related software listed in Awesome Space: https://github.com/orbitalindex/awesome-space

Also if you want to work on wind based simulation maybe this project might interest you https://github.com/orbitersim/orbiter The flight dynamic model is not super accurate and the author is not using the off the shelf library like jsbsim so a lot of improvements are possible.

"OpenOrbiter" is a misnomer, because Orbiter is already open and under MIT. I want everyone to know and understand that the real Orbiter repo, with commits being directly made by the good doctor is this one: https://github.com/orbitersim/orbiter

If you like space there is vega strike , pioneer and orbiter.

orbiter? (it's a space simulator)