awesome-python VS golang-standards/project-layout

Python: https://github.com/vinta/awesome-python

6) Awesome Python: Embrace the power of Python with this extensive collection of awesome libraries, frameworks, resources, and software. Whether you're a seasoned Pythonista or just starting your journey, this repository is your ultimate guide to maximizing the potential of this versatile language. (https://github.com/vinta/awesome-python)

- https://github.com/vinta/awesome-python

🎇 Repository Link: Awesome Python

Explore here.

I know of curated lists like https://github.com/vinta/awesome-python but they are nowhere close to alternativeto.net in terms of information (relations) and community involvement.

https://github.com/vinta/awesome-python

There are a lot of python packages for engineering and scientific applications (as well as other applications in general, and, thanks to the inherently collaborative nature of free software, they are only growing in quantity and quality. Many MATLAB toolboxes already have Python equivalents.

cmd: here where we will leave the main.go that starts our app.

> https://github.com/golang-standards/project-layout

The name of the repo is really and intentionally misleading. rsc filled an issue there to point this out, but the repo maintainer just disabled issues altogether so now no one can see it.

Even when it would not have such parasitic name, many seasoned Go programmers, me included, consider the self-proclaimed "Standard Go project Layout" as the opposite of what is good and advisable.

Unfortunately, the name just works, so it is being recommended all over the Internet since its inception.

Your comment makes it look as if you're saying you hate the Go development team, but it seems that isn't the case.

I get a little of what you're saying, I wouldn't say I hate anyone, but I strongly dislike how a lot of projects are organized. I think a lot stems from https://github.com/golang-standards/project-layout , which pretended to be standard and was so (ab)used one of the creators opened an issue about it. If you look at the actual Go src, it's much, much cleaner.

So you don't get blind sided for self proclaimed "standards" that are not

I am writing a project that has two components: a CLI and a library. I've organised the project as follows (as per organisation instructions):

Familiarity with the standard Golang project structure, which you can find here.

I've been learning how to build web applications using different frameworks and languages for a while now, such as Laravel with its MVC architecture and Node.js following the 'Hapi.js Way'. As I'm trying to create a new portfolio project using Go, I found myself contemplating over the ideal project structure. I wanted something that not only aligns with the standard Go project layout, but also makes the code both easy to write and understand. That's when I stumbled upon the concept of Hexagonal Architecture, as showcased in Netflix's engineering blog. The idea of seamlessly swapping infrastructures with minimal code changes fascinated me, and I decided to implement it in my new project.